Crooked mind. Constant washing in the name of a squeaky clean
nationhood. No, seriously Pat, what I asked you to think of was normal
people who need guns or cars without having to be either threatening
aggressors or whimsical victims. A gamekeeper who looks after the wild
animals could be such an individual who might need both. Now that I'm
telling you, it shouldn't feel alien anymore. ;-)

On 3 Feb., 16:34, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3 Feb, 14:00, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Puh, Pat. You cannot deny your American upbringing.
>
> Never tried to.
>
> Me, myself and I -
>
> > full circle. Fear is for others.
>
> I'm not sure I understand your impugnment.  When I try to relate to
> things, I tend to use personal pronouns that are of the first person.
> It's a carry-over from being a Germanic language, as German itself has
> them, too.
>
> But, perhaps more properly, fear is for victims.
>
> > There are non-criminal people living today who really need guns. And
> > there are non-criminal people living on this beautiful planet who
> > really need cars. Let's start thinking what kinds of people these
> > could be. You might find it helpful to begin with finding potential
> > reasons for such alien behaviour.
>
> Cops could be in both categories.  Does that mean that cops require
> reasons for their alien behaviours?  But cops are far from being
> exempt from criminal behaviours.  Thus the British term 'bent
> cop' (doesn't mean he's homosexual).
>
> > On 3 Feb., 14:11, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 2 Feb, 17:24, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Chris,
>
> > > > I don't think it's about misperception. A car, a pool, a knife... each 
> > > > of
> > > > these serve essential, non-violent, functions. A gun is designed to 
> > > > kill; it
> > > > has no other purpose. If people want to shoot targets, use a gun that 
> > > > shoots
> > > > an infrared beam at an electronic target, or play a video game. In 
> > > > terms of
> > > > the theory, eliminating guns as a risk makes a lot of sense.
>
> > > > Eliminating cars has inherent functional problems for our society.
>
> > >   Much the same ones as eliminating guns.  The biggest one being that
> > > those who have them and want them simply WON'T be handing them over to
> > > anyone.  This leaves ALL the guns in criminal hands.  Personally, I'd
> > > rather have one myself, so the criminal doesn't ALWAYS have one up on
> > > me.  It's obvious that we don't NEED guns or cars, as humans lived
> > > many millenia prior to their invention, but, as you say, eliminating
> > > things that people want is always tricky.
>
> > > > Ian
>
> > > > 2009/2/2 Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > In 'Freakonomics', Steven Levitt explored the remarkable phenomenon of
> > > > > parental misperception of risk. He noted that a child was 11 times 
> > > > > more
> > > > > likely to die by swimming accident at a friend's house with a pool, 
> > > > > than by
> > > > > shooting accident at a friend's house with a gun, and yet parents as a
> > > > > generality never restricted play due to the presence of a pool, but 
> > > > > would
> > > > > restrict play due to the presence of a gun.
> > > > > Statistically, I am far more likely to kill you with my:
>
> > > > > car
> > > > > knife
> > > > > baseball bat or other blunt trauma intrument
> > > > > alcohol
>
> > > > > than with my gun, yet your perception of personal risk is so skewed 
> > > > > that
> > > > > you literally feel your freedom is impinged upon merely by my 
> > > > > possession of
> > > > > this tool. That's a psychological phenomenon that is really 
> > > > > irrelevant to
> > > > > the greater conversation, and which probably deserves a thread unto 
> > > > > its
> > > > > own.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ian Pollard 
> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > >> Your posession of a firearm makes me less safe. Not being murdered 
> > > > >> or hurt
> > > > >> is a pretty fundamental freedom; can we agree on that much? Now, am 
> > > > >> I more
> > > > >> likely to be a victim of gun crime in a country with lots of guns or 
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> country with very few?
>
> > > > >> (First person to mention Switzerland gets bitch-slapped.)
>
> > > > >> Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to