Tell Saint Pat who claims "It's obvious that we don't NEED guns or
cars". Only his earthly form is so weak it prefers carrying a gun.

On 3 Feb., 15:02, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> What's "Alien" about this behaviour, Gabby? Human have practiced it since
> long before we were Sapiens. Every pre-modern species of human-kind has
> developed and carried weaponry, to the best of their technological ability.
> "Alien" is the supposition we would NOT need it.
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:00 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Puh, Pat. You cannot deny your American upbringing. Me, myself and I -
> > full circle. Fear is for others.
>
> > There are non-criminal people living today who really need guns. And
> > there are non-criminal people living on this beautiful planet who
> > really need cars. Let's start thinking what kinds of people these
> > could be. You might find it helpful to begin with finding potential
> > reasons for such alien behaviour.
>
> > On 3 Feb., 14:11, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 2 Feb, 17:24, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Chris,
>
> > > > I don't think it's about misperception. A car, a pool, a knife... each
> > of
> > > > these serve essential, non-violent, functions. A gun is designed to
> > kill; it
> > > > has no other purpose. If people want to shoot targets, use a gun that
> > shoots
> > > > an infrared beam at an electronic target, or play a video game. In
> > terms of
> > > > the theory, eliminating guns as a risk makes a lot of sense.
>
> > > > Eliminating cars has inherent functional problems for our society.
>
> > >   Much the same ones as eliminating guns.  The biggest one being that
> > > those who have them and want them simply WON'T be handing them over to
> > > anyone.  This leaves ALL the guns in criminal hands.  Personally, I'd
> > > rather have one myself, so the criminal doesn't ALWAYS have one up on
> > > me.  It's obvious that we don't NEED guns or cars, as humans lived
> > > many millenia prior to their invention, but, as you say, eliminating
> > > things that people want is always tricky.
>
> > > > Ian
>
> > > > 2009/2/2 Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > In 'Freakonomics', Steven Levitt explored the remarkable phenomenon
> > of
> > > > > parental misperception of risk. He noted that a child was 11 times
> > more
> > > > > likely to die by swimming accident at a friend's house with a pool,
> > than by
> > > > > shooting accident at a friend's house with a gun, and yet parents as
> > a
> > > > > generality never restricted play due to the presence of a pool, but
> > would
> > > > > restrict play due to the presence of a gun.
> > > > > Statistically, I am far more likely to kill you with my:
>
> > > > > car
> > > > > knife
> > > > > baseball bat or other blunt trauma intrument
> > > > > alcohol
>
> > > > > than with my gun, yet your perception of personal risk is so skewed
> > that
> > > > > you literally feel your freedom is impinged upon merely by my
> > possession of
> > > > > this tool. That's a psychological phenomenon that is really
> > irrelevant to
> > > > > the greater conversation, and which probably deserves a thread unto
> > its
> > > > > own.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ian Pollard <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > >> Your posession of a firearm makes me less safe. Not being murdered
> > or hurt
> > > > >> is a pretty fundamental freedom; can we agree on that much? Now, am
> > I more
> > > > >> likely to be a victim of gun crime in a country with lots of guns or
> > a
> > > > >> country with very few?
>
> > > > >> (First person to mention Switzerland gets bitch-slapped.)
>
> > > > >> Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to