I think we can express ourselves without belittling or diminishing any
other.

On Feb 28, 12:30 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> The goings on are hardly going on to be honest Slip.  I'm generally a
> supporter of a kind of ruthless honesty - perhaps a rather naive
> approach that more or less accepts that status quo opinion is
> embroiled with the Undead.  In some ways we can never really tell the
> truth to power and are broadly treated as mad by it if we stray from
> supplication.  Films from New World to Changeling show just how cruel
> establishments can be, but there is a sense in which we can only watch
> this as film, not confront it directly.  The Soviets used to send
> their dissidents to the madhouse, and actually our history is not that
> much better (though it is better).
> There is a sense in which we dare not look at ourselves and that we
> need to dare.  Yet this needs a spirit of mutual understanding as an
> aim and a practical recognition that much character assassination and
> barbarism is waiting once we are prepared to breach taboo.  The simple
> spirit of this is in the notion that one might not share an opinion
> but does support the right of others to hold it and articulate it.
> Just as we begin to open up, we forget this is a very dirty world.
> The balancing acts are difficult.
>
> On 28 Feb, 04:01, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > What are you saying, Slip ?  I just couldn't fathom.
>
> > On 28 Feb, 06:15, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Where is everyone?
> > > I visited the e pissedofftomogly group to see the vehemence directed
> > > at this house.  There is not a shred of censorship that is being
> > > purported by some.  Rules are rules that are understood when one joins
> > > any group discussion and not to be discarded when one has reached a
> > > level of I've been here long enough to disregard. I find it vile and
> > > putrescent that some think they can manipulate a group by alienation.
> > > To start a hall of shame thread which actually calls for surnames is
> > > totally absurd and self motivated.   Kudos to you my friend arch for
> > > not taking part in such an apparent act of childishness!  This is not
> > > to say the epistemology group is without merit and of intellectual
> > > stature but to point out that in that group as well, tolerance towards
> > > that behavior should be nil.  It makes the group look bad and it
> > > should be nipped at the bud.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to