Funny, chazwin said the same thing about his then 12-year-old son. Strangely enough this game didn't have the same soothing effect on him that it had on his son. That you as a grandparent don't react is normal, his parents are probably held responsible for his behaviour. Does he come over to your house as a stress relief, yes? My father pays my son for good grades at school, that's another way of stress relief, you see. And Craig's avatar is Kierkecraig, he set that straight many a time.
On 2 Mrz., 14:29, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I have spent many of the last months modding GTA for my grandson > Gabby. Chris would be a poor neo-Nazi - he looks far too clumsy to > get the double-heeled jackboot thump and the salute up with slick > timing. I'd pay more attention to real reasons if any of this was > worth thinking about. My grandson is more or less genocidal in GTA > IV, yet is a very gentle kid amongst his peers. Perhaps we should > write up this incident in machine code? Though I dread to think what > an avatar of Craig smirking would look like! > > On 2 Mar, 11:36, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hahaha. Let me admit in turn, that the more I loosen up on insisting > > on reading, thinking and good social behaviour as educational > > essentials the happier my son gets. Intercultural demands make it that > > I allow him to play GTA that he got for his 11th birthday and he loves > > it. And positive vibration is all that ever mattered, right? ;-) > > > On 2 Mrz., 04:41, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My dark secret is out. Well, it's nice to finally get it off my chest. > > > Guess I'll bust out my jackboots and suspenders now. ;) > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bDY0DfEjmo > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Apparently you're a neonazi Chris. > > > > > On Mar 1, 2:23 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Yes indeed, Molly. :) Somehow, I knew I could count on you for a > > > >> little happy sunshine. > > > > >> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > I think we can express ourselves without belittling or diminishing > > > >> > any > > > >> > other. > > > > >> > On Feb 28, 12:30 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> The goings on are hardly going on to be honest Slip. I'm generally > > > >> >> a > > > >> >> supporter of a kind of ruthless honesty - perhaps a rather naive > > > >> >> approach that more or less accepts that status quo opinion is > > > >> >> embroiled with the Undead. In some ways we can never really tell > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> truth to power and are broadly treated as mad by it if we stray from > > > >> >> supplication. Films from New World to Changeling show just how > > > >> >> cruel > > > >> >> establishments can be, but there is a sense in which we can only > > > >> >> watch > > > >> >> this as film, not confront it directly. The Soviets used to send > > > >> >> their dissidents to the madhouse, and actually our history is not > > > >> >> that > > > >> >> much better (though it is better). > > > >> >> There is a sense in which we dare not look at ourselves and that we > > > >> >> need to dare. Yet this needs a spirit of mutual understanding as an > > > >> >> aim and a practical recognition that much character assassination > > > >> >> and > > > >> >> barbarism is waiting once we are prepared to breach taboo. The > > > >> >> simple > > > >> >> spirit of this is in the notion that one might not share an opinion > > > >> >> but does support the right of others to hold it and articulate it. > > > >> >> Just as we begin to open up, we forget this is a very dirty world. > > > >> >> The balancing acts are difficult. > > > > >> >> On 28 Feb, 04:01, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> > What are you saying, Slip ? I just couldn't fathom. > > > > >> >> > On 28 Feb, 06:15, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> >> > > Where is everyone? > > > >> >> > > I visited the e pissedofftomogly group to see the vehemence > > > >> >> > > directed > > > >> >> > > at this house. There is not a shred of censorship that is being > > > >> >> > > purported by some. Rules are rules that are understood when > > > >> >> > > one joins > > > >> >> > > any group discussion and not to be discarded when one has > > > >> >> > > reached a > > > >> >> > > level of I've been here long enough to disregard. I find it > > > >> >> > > vile and > > > >> >> > > putrescent that some think they can manipulate a group by > > > >> >> > > alienation. > > > >> >> > > To start a hall of shame thread which actually calls for > > > >> >> > > surnames is > > > >> >> > > totally absurd and self motivated. Kudos to you my friend > > > >> >> > > arch for > > > >> >> > > not taking part in such an apparent act of childishness! This > > > >> >> > > is not > > > >> >> > > to say the epistemology group is without merit and of > > > >> >> > > intellectual > > > >> >> > > stature but to point out that in that group as well, tolerance > > > >> >> > > towards > > > >> >> > > that behavior should be nil. It makes the group look bad and it > > > >> >> > > should be nipped at the bud. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
