Apparently you're a neonazi Chris.
On Mar 1, 2:23 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes indeed, Molly. :) Somehow, I knew I could count on you for a
> little happy sunshine.
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think we can express ourselves without belittling or diminishing any
> > other.
>
> > On Feb 28, 12:30 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The goings on are hardly going on to be honest Slip. I'm generally a
> >> supporter of a kind of ruthless honesty - perhaps a rather naive
> >> approach that more or less accepts that status quo opinion is
> >> embroiled with the Undead. In some ways we can never really tell the
> >> truth to power and are broadly treated as mad by it if we stray from
> >> supplication. Films from New World to Changeling show just how cruel
> >> establishments can be, but there is a sense in which we can only watch
> >> this as film, not confront it directly. The Soviets used to send
> >> their dissidents to the madhouse, and actually our history is not that
> >> much better (though it is better).
> >> There is a sense in which we dare not look at ourselves and that we
> >> need to dare. Yet this needs a spirit of mutual understanding as an
> >> aim and a practical recognition that much character assassination and
> >> barbarism is waiting once we are prepared to breach taboo. The simple
> >> spirit of this is in the notion that one might not share an opinion
> >> but does support the right of others to hold it and articulate it.
> >> Just as we begin to open up, we forget this is a very dirty world.
> >> The balancing acts are difficult.
>
> >> On 28 Feb, 04:01, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > What are you saying, Slip ? I just couldn't fathom.
>
> >> > On 28 Feb, 06:15, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > Where is everyone?
> >> > > I visited the e pissedofftomogly group to see the vehemence directed
> >> > > at this house. There is not a shred of censorship that is being
> >> > > purported by some. Rules are rules that are understood when one joins
> >> > > any group discussion and not to be discarded when one has reached a
> >> > > level of I've been here long enough to disregard. I find it vile and
> >> > > putrescent that some think they can manipulate a group by alienation.
> >> > > To start a hall of shame thread which actually calls for surnames is
> >> > > totally absurd and self motivated. Kudos to you my friend arch for
> >> > > not taking part in such an apparent act of childishness! This is not
> >> > > to say the epistemology group is without merit and of intellectual
> >> > > stature but to point out that in that group as well, tolerance towards
> >> > > that behavior should be nil. It makes the group look bad and it
> >> > > should be nipped at the bud.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
