'debate' often leaves little
than some form of protest like self-immolation.

debate, yes.  But dialogue raises consciousness.

On Mar 23, 2:38 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Less of the old you young whipper-snapper Jenkins!  There is a lot to
> be said on getting hold of something better than victimisation and
> such stuff as the existential hero, but we have to note that these
> 'games' are played everywhere and that 'debate' often leaves little
> than some form of protest like self-immolation.  There is a very
> strong mechanism in such decent things as patience and politeness
> (manners in Elias) that seeks to prevent truth and engage secrecy for
> the wrong reasons.  At some point we become intolerant of intolerance.
> impatient with patience - and may not be wrong.  Tolerance itself can
> be highly intolerant, just another prejudice in those who learn
> rhetoric rather than develop - rather like the 'new man' out to get
> into knickers with his new strategy of sexual equality.
>
> On 23 Mar, 05:13, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Justin !  Inspiring, reminding ... the best of what
> > international virtual community members can give to each other.
>
> > On Mar 23, 9:46 am, Justintruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Kierkegaard on despair:
>
> > > Just as the physician might say that there lives perhaps not one
> > > single man who is in perfect health, so one might say perhaps that
> > > there lives not one single man who after all is not to some extent in
> > > despair, in whose inmost parts there does not dwell a disquietude, a
> > > perturbation, a discord, an anxious dread of an unknown something, or
> > > of a something he does not even dare to make acquaintance with, dread
> > > of a possibility of life, or dread of himself, so that, after all, as
> > > physicians speak of a man going about with a disease in him, this man
> > > is going about and carrying a sickness of the spirit, which only
> > > rarely and in glimpses, by and with a dread which to him is
> > > inexplicable, gives evidence of its presence within.
>
> > > Su Kyi on fear:
>
> > > It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts
> > > those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who
> > > are subject to it. ...
>
> > > The quintessential revolution is that of the spirit, born of an
> > > intellectual conviction of the need for change in those mental
> > > attitudes and values which shape the course of a nation's development.
> > > A revolution which aims merely at changing official policies and
> > > institutions with a view to an improvement in material conditions has
> > > little chance of genuine success. Without a revolution of the spirit,
> > > the forces which produced the iniquities of the old order would
> > > continue to be operative, posing a constant threat to the process of
> > > reform and regeneration. It is not enough merely to call for freedom,
> > > democracy and human rights. There has to be a united determination to
> > > persevere in the struggle, to make sacrifices in the name of enduring
> > > truths, to resist the corrupting influences ofdesire, ill will,
> > > ignorance and fear...
>
> > > Within a system which denies the existence of basic human rights, fear
> > > tends to be the order of the day. Fear of imprisonment, fear of
> > > torture, fear ofdeath, fear of losing friends, family, property or
> > > means of livelihood, fear of poverty, fear of isolation, fear of
> > > failure. A most insidious form of fear is that which masquerades as
> > > common sense or even wisdom, condemning as foolish, reckless,
> > > insignificant or futile the small, daily acts of courage which help to
> > > preserve man's self-respect and inherent human dignity. It is not easy
> > > for a people conditioned by fear under the iron rule of the principle
> > > that might is right to free themselves from the enervating miasma of
> > > fear. Yet even under the most crushing state machinery courage rises
> > > up again and again, for fear is not the natural state of civilized
> > > man.
>
> > > The wellspring of courage and endurance in the face of unbridled power
> > > is generally a firm belief in the sanctity of ethical principles
> > > combined with a historical sense that despite all setbacks the
> > > condition of man is set on an ultimate course for both spiritual and
> > > material advancement. It is his capacity for self-improvement and self-
> > > redemption which most distinguishes man from the mere brute. At the
> > > root of human responsibility is the concept of peffection, the urge to
> > > achieve it, the intelligence to find a path towards it, and the will
> > > to follow that path if not to the end at least the distance needed to
> > > rise above individual limitations and environmental impediments. It is
> > > man's vision of a world fit for rational, civilized humanity which
> > > leads him to dare and to suffer to build societies free from want and
> > > fear. Concepts such as truth, justice and compassion cannot be
> > > dismissed as trite when these are often the only bulwarks which stand
> > > against ruthless power.
>
> > > Jane Goodal on understanding (Oh yes she knows a little something of
> > > chimps...! ;) )
>
> > > Thinking back over my life, it seems to me that there are different
> > > ways of looking out and trying to understand the world around us.
> > > There's a very clear scientific window. And it does enable us to
> > > understand an awful lot about what's out there. There's another
> > > window, it's the window through which the wise men, the holy men, the
> > > masters, of the different and great religions look as they try to
> > > understand the meaning in the world. My own preference is the window
> > > of the mystic.
>
> > > Jane Godal on Hope
>
> > > There is the terrible pollution around the world, the balance of
> > > nature is disturbed, and we are destroying our beautiful planet. There
> > > are fears of new epidemics for which there will be no drugs, and,
> > > rather than fight the cause, we torture millions of animals in the
> > > name of medical progress. But in spite of all this I do have hope. And
> > > my hope is based on three factors.
>
> > > The Human Brain
>
> > > Firstly, we have at last begun to understand and face up to the
> > > problems that threaten us and the survival of life on Earth as we know
> > > it. Surely, then, we can use our problem-solving abilities, our
> > > brains, and, joining hands around the world, find ways to live that
> > > are in harmony with nature. Indeed, many companies have begun
> > > "greening" their operations, and millions of people worldwide are
> > > beginning to realize that each one of us has a responsibility to the
> > > environment and our descendants, and that the way each one of us lives
> > > our life does matter, does make a difference.
>
> > > The Determination of Young People
>
> > > My second reason for hope lies in the tremendous energy, enthusiasm
> > > and commitment of a growing number of young people around the world.
> > > As they find out about the environmental and social problems that are
> > > now part of their heritage, they want to fight to right the wrongs. Of
> > > course they do - they have a vested interest in this, for it will be
> > > their world tomorrow. They will be moving into leadership positions,
> > > into the work force, becoming parents themselves. Young people, when
> > > informed and empowered, when they realize that what they do truly
> > > makes a difference, can indeed change the world.
>
> > > The Indomitable Human Spirit
>
> > > My third reason for hope lies in the indomitable nature of the human
> > > spirit. There are so many people who have dreamed seemingly
> > > unattainable dreams and, because they never gave up, achieved their
> > > goals against all the odds, or blazed a path along which others could
> > > follow. As I travel around the world I meet so many incredible and
> > > amazing human beings. They inspire me. They inspire those around them.
>
> > > The Resilience of Nature
>
> > > My fourth reason for hope is the incredible resilience of nature. I
> > > have visited Nagasaki, site of the second atomic bomb that ended World
> > > War II. Scientists had predicted that nothing could grow there for at
> > > least 30 years. But, amazingly, greenery grew very quickly. One
> > > sapling actually managed to survive the bombing, and today it is a
> > > large tree, with great cracks and fissures, all black inside; but that
> > > tree still produces leaves. I carry one of those leaves with me as a
> > > powerful symbol of hope. I have seen such renewals time and again,
> > > including animal species brought back from the brink of extinction.
>
> > > So let us move into the next millennium with hope, for without it all
> > > we can do is eat and drink the last of our resources as we watch our
> > > planet slowly die. Instead, let us have faith in ourselves, in our
> > > intellect, in our staunch spirit. Let us develop respect for all
> > > living things. Let us try to replace impatience and intolerance with
> > > understanding and compassion. And love.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to