Pipe, peace pipe, pvc pipe. Chris doesn't care, as long as you can put weed in it. :)
On Mar 27, 11:50 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it is time to pass the pipe - peace pipe that is. > > On Mar 27, 10:29 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I rather like being brought up by my pretensions and am generally OK > > with people who mean little harm. At deeper levels I am coming to the > > view that rational discussion is plagued by power problems and we need > > better means to recognise these. Ribbing may well be part of that. > > > On 27 Mar, 14:15, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > To tell the truth Molly, I hardly understand what she is saying most > > > of the time, so if she is meaning to offend, I'm not catching it. > > > > On Mar 27, 5:40 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > While you find it amusing, Neil, I find it confrontational and > > > > disrespectful so usually ignore it. She does have a way of staying on > > > > the border, under the bridge, and not coming out guns blazing. One > > > > good sting and off she goes smiling. I am surprised to see it openly > > > > discussed, but am glad to see it is noticed by the moderators. > > > > > On Mar 27, 1:50 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I understand the bot bit, though my dreams of robotised women take a > > > > > rather different form! There are supposedly some very advanced text > > > > > engines - indeed a friend of mine has turned into one and is making a > > > > > partial living writing art criticism whilst unable to distinguish > > > > > between an Old Master and a lump of Edam. 'Deep Maiden' makes me > > > > > laugh, which is better than having women sniggering about me! I guess > > > > > we won't get to the truth until she utters '42' and asks for a > > > > > substantial rebuild in order to find out the question. Around the > > > > > Iron Man camp-fire, you and I are well into a crate of Steinlager and > > > > > Craig is crushing burned corn whilst clocking up some client fees on > > > > > his mobile (he's representing a Muslim woman for unfair dismissal over > > > > > insisting her husband and a Taliban sect accompany her to work in the > > > > > Pentagon) and we have a note about domestic duties from Ian. A couple > > > > > of really fat guys who came in a Chieftan tank have caught a hippy > > > > > somewhere in the distance and have just borrowed a rope. Seeing this > > > > > we have concealed our large, self-manufactured cigarette in Craig's > > > > > wallet for later ... > > > > > > On 27 Mar, 04:17, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Actually, strangely, the opposite is true, Neil old boy. I had the > > > > > > instinct to be stung, and yet I couldn't place my finger on the why. > > > > > > The motivation was missing. At times, it almost seems like Gabs is > > > > > > some advanced form of AI cycling off responses according to a sense > > > > > > of > > > > > > programming I haven't quite figured out. So instead, I decided to > > > > > > address the source and see if could understand what the line of > > > > > > questioning was. If it's simple Puckery, then I'll wink and > > > > > > laugh...well played indeed. It was prostitute that did it...a word > > > > > > so > > > > > > disconnected from the depth of connectedness in my post that I had > > > > > > to > > > > > > assume it was some sort of trolling. Gab's lack of an overt > > > > > > malicious > > > > > > nature makes it difficult to actually take offense, although the > > > > > > undeserved sense of persecution at times is a bit worrisome. > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:00 AM, archytas <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Socrates claimed to act like a gadfly Chris. One lingers briefly > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > the hope that Gabbers might be easier on the eye than the greek- > > > > > > > sandalled hemlock quaffer before realising sexism is crass and > > > > > > > lookism > > > > > > > a major fetish of history. There are times to rise to the bait > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > others in which solace can only be gleaned by flying on a beetle > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > the moon, in tense consideration of the porpoise of the universe. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > suspect you have been stung mate, though as more than a three-time > > > > > > > loser on the gently-vicious sex front, I fear I cannot give expert > > > > > > > evidence. Ointments and unctions may give relief to those Chris- > > > > > > > crossed on the crucifix of censorship or spiked on the kebab. > > > > > > > Let's > > > > > > > dream up an Iron Man hippy-cull and test the ultimate out of body > > > > > > > ethical question of our age - whether it should be legal to take > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > stash off a dead hippy (Cartman for the defence) whilst doing a > > > > > > > Flying > > > > > > > Harrington stoned on that non-coffee corn burnings the Mormons > > > > > > > use in > > > > > > > conversion rights. I'm telling you man, this is good stuff! > > > > > > > > On 26 Mar, 15:19, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> That I would do what again, ban you? I wasn't the one who banned > > > > > > >> you the first time, Donna, nor do I know the history behind it, > > > > > > >> although I might guess it had something to do with abstract > > > > > > >> posts of an inflammatory nature. In your history here, you've > > > > > > >> been known to inject emails which seemengly had nothing to do > > > > > > >> with the topic at hand, including one notable thread where you > > > > > > >> accused the Mind's Eye Icon of being racist because the eye was > > > > > > >> blue. > > > > > > > >> As opposed to simply dismissing you out of sorts, since you > > > > > > >> don't seem to actually display any sort of maliciousness, I'm > > > > > > >> simply trying to understand what it is you are trying to say. Is > > > > > > >> there a point to your posts, or are you the Robin Goodfellow of > > > > > > >> the Eye, determined to inject mischief where you see fit? I have > > > > > > >> seen thoughtful participation from you, articulate conversation > > > > > > >> on complex topics. I know that this isn't a language barrier > > > > > > >> issue. I don't really think you are trying to martyr yourself on > > > > > > >> the cross of "Chris is a horrid censor", which is a load of > > > > > > >> bollocks anyways. So, fess up, Gabs. Does it crack you up > > > > > > >> endlessly to constantly have us on so? > > > > > > > >> [ Attached Message ]From:gabbydott > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>Date:Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:37:16 -0700 > > > > > > >> (PDT)Local:Thurs 26 Mar 2009 10:37Subject:[Mind's Eye] Re: > > > > > > >> Speaking of Out of Body Experiences... > > > > > > > >> Tense mistake. The question always goes : what is the porpoise. > > > > > > >> Now I would say that I found out that you would do it again. > > > > > > > >> On 26 Mrz., 00:03, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > I would rather you explain the purpose behind making a > > > > > > >> > baseless and inflammatory post. Nothing in your statement > > > > > > >> > carries a true correlation to what I actually wrote...it bore > > > > > > >> > only the most surface resemblance to the topic, and as noted, > > > > > > >> > used loaded language of an insulting nature. If you're not > > > > > > >> > trolling, what was the purpose? > > > > > > > >> > [ Angehängte Nachricht ]Von:gabbydott > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]>In:"\"Minds Eye\"" > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]>Datum:Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:25:54 > > > > > > >> > -0700 (PDT)Lokal:Mi 25 Mrz. 2009 23:25Betreff:[Mind's Eye] Re: > > > > > > >> > Speaking of Out of Body Experiences... > > > > > > > >> > No, I'm not. Do you want to ban me nevertheless - again? > > > > > > > >> > On 25 Mrz., 15:14, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > Gabby, that's a nice turn of phrase, but completely > > > > > > >> > > discounts everything I posted, and uses loaded language > > > > > > >> > > which seems intended to insult. Being the fan of > > > > > > >> > > Wittgenstein that you are, I've wondered if your recent > > > > > > >> > > bouts of cantankerousness (with Orn and Slip) were intended > > > > > > >> > > to spark ire, while your twinkling eyes watched with a > > > > > > >> > > giggle. > > > > > > > >> > > Are you trolling, Gabs? > > > > > > > >> > > [ Angehängte Nachricht ]Von:gabbydott > > > > > > >> > > <[email protected]>In:"\"Minds Eye\"" > > > > > > >> > > <[email protected]>Datum:Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:30:11 > > > > > > >> > > -0700 (PDT)Lokal:Mi 25 Mrz. 2009 12:30Betreff:[Mind's Eye] > > > > > > >> > > Re: Speaking of Out of Body Experiences... > > > > > > > >> > > Speak about your own pains that make you a prostitute for > > > > > > >> > > delusional > > > > > > >> > > substances instead of ideas, Chris. Kierke set his > > > > > > >> > > understanding > > > > > > >> > > parameters to overstand, which is fair enough. > > > > > > > >> > > On 24 Mrz., 20:20, Chris Jenkins > > > > > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > Ah, so you do enjoy a bit of novacaine when having molars > > > > > > >> > > > extracted > > > > > > >> > > > then...and admit that you're only being pedantic and > > > > > > >> > > > pedagogical when > > > > > > >> > > > making such broad condemnations across a vast portion of > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > >> > > > population. > > > > > > > >> > > > In your defense, the "Mormons' Struggle" is part of your > > > > > > >> > > > ideology. > > > > > > >> > > > Combined with the "Salt of the Earth" hard working > > > > > > >> > > > farmers' lifestyle, > > > > > > >> > > > I would expect a hard edged outlook. However, even farmers > > > > > > >> > > > like a good > > > > > > >> > > > pint of beer and a couple of Advil after plowing the north > > > > > > >> > > > 40. It's > > > > > > >> > > > all about gradients. > > > > > > > >> > > > Winston Churchill turned to the attractive woman next to > > > > > > >> > > > him and > > > > > > >> > > > asked, "Madam, would you be convinced to sleep with me for > > > > > > >> > > > a million > > > > > > >> > > > pounds?" > > > > > > > >> > > > "A million pounds? Why, of course!" she replied. > > > > > > > >> > > > "Well then, how about ten pounds?" he asked. > > > > > > > >> > > > "Mr. Churchill! What kind of woman do you think I am?" she > > > > > > >> > > > responded angrily. > > > > > > > >> > > > "We've already established that," he replied. "Now we're > > > > > > >> > > > negotiating the price." > > > > > > > >> > > > When there are exceptions to the rule, then we have > > > > > > >> > > > validated the fact > > > > > > >> > > > that the rule is not absolute, and what constitutes an > > > > > > >> > > > exception > > > > > > >> > > > varies according to the perception of the person granting > > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > > >> > > > exception. You may find it weak that my best friend, who > > > > > > >> > > > has an > > > > > > >> > > > advanced degenerative case of MS needs both Merinol and > > > > > > >> > > > smoked > > > > > > >> > > > Marijuana to ease the muscle spasticity and other symptoms > > > > > > >> > > > to > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
