Hello Lee, Thank you for the welcome. This is the fourth time I've responded to this post. I finally figured out why it wasn't getting on the board. (I hope)
I can understand and accept the point of view you express. The difference in our point of view would be the definition of the word 'natural'. The definition I spoke with might be considered prudish. Yes, with that prudish definition of 'natural', I could give a long list of things 'unnatural'. I'd begin after mankind acquired free will and began raising himself above the 'natural' animal. peace & Love On Apr 8, 1:47 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Tinker if you are new to us then welcome. > > The anus is most assuredly a natural sex organ. If two men decide to > have bum sex, then both of the men, are part of nature, sex is clearly > natural, as are all parts of the body, the inclination to have sex, > etc... > > The word 'unatural' has more to do with emtional feelings than any > kind of usefull definition. Can you name even one thing that IS that > is not natural? > > On 7 Apr, 19:48, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello People, > > > Excuse me for butting in (above) with the authoritative tone and > > without recognizing you all. I spent a couple of days getting my > > thoughts together for the post, then I had a problem actually posting > > and forgot about greeting you. I do speak as if I know what I'm > > talking about because of many years running construction work, the > > tone of authority is necessary. I really am open to alternate views > > though. > > > Allan said, "I think society is more immoral than moral." > > My understanding along that line would be more specific, 'business' > > instead of the whole of Society. The 'rule' of business 'does' suspend > > moral consideration for an advantage necessary to succeed in a > > competitive environment. > > > Molly said, " Is morality only what we feel is good for us? Or is > > there a > > greater good to consider? > > I believe that considering the greater good would be criteria for > > 'moral'. > > > Michael stirred up an idea that I will present to any discussion on > > the subject of homosexuality. I am not anti-gay, and have friends who > > are gay. The personal beliefs concerning the sanctity of ones physical > > being would define whether or not the act is considered immoral. The > > rectum is not, never has been and never will be a 'natural' sex organ. > > > ornamentalmind said, "The notion of usury has always been suspect..." > > Whether or not Jesus was, the idea of him turning over the tables of > > the money-changers, supports the statement. > > > peace & Love --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
