"i see...so either u dont have any opinions or your biased...right? " - e-s
No, by definition an opinion is subjective and thus a bias...based upon one's past. On Apr 27, 5:36 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > i see...so either u dont have any opinions or your biased...right? > > On Apr 27, 5:57 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "...unless stating an opinion could be considered > > biased. ..." - e-s > > > Well, yes, you could say that that is the case. In fact, it IS the > > case. > > > On Apr 27, 1:57 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > without referrence to what u consider jumbled or out of focus i cannot > > > comment unless its a generalization. i do not feel i have offered a > > > bias on anything, unless stating an opinion could be considered > > > biased. im not sure what u mean by "It is difficult to understand the > > > message being portrayed especially when words are taken back and > > > other's opinions are the core basis for new ideas.", so again i cant > > > comment...as far as making u think...hey, sorry bout that! ;-^) > > > > On Apr 27, 2:24 pm, Rosey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I will refrain from giving a negative opinion, as that is most likely > > > > what will end up being interpreted. But I too find e's comments a bit > > > > jumbled and out of focus. It is difficult to understand the message > > > > being portrayed especially when words are taken back and other's > > > > opinions are the core basis for new ideas. e try to remain focused > > > > and find non-biased validity in your claims. I do enjoy reading > > > > everyone's comments and find each and every contributor to be a worthy > > > > donor. Your input causes me to think. > > > > > On Apr 27, 11:00 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Synonym for "wow". Alleged etymology: A way of saying "Jesus!" without > > > > > being accused of swearing. More often used as a negative exclamation > > > > > than a positive one. > > > > > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gee%20wiz > > > > > > Caustic? LOL I'm sure Orn was up all night crying his eyes out! > > > > > Stop projecting your own interpretation, regardless of the inaccuracy, > > > > > onto Orn. > > > > > > 'superficial, > > > > > frenetic, without depth, simplistic interpretation, mental cache dump, > > > > > etc.<<< espace > > > > > > Caustic? Lesson? Teacher? Preach? What? > > > > > > Again you project your own timidity upon other readers. If you are > > > > > offended it is your personal choice to feel that way but that in and > > > > > of itself does not attach new meaning to words very commonly used in > > > > > Minds Eye, many of which I learned to use from others, including > > > > > Orn. > > > > > > I would have to ask other members if you have any clue of what you are > > > > > saying because I certainly don't think you know what you are talking > > > > > about. Unless of course I get out my espace dictionary. > > > > > > On Apr 27, 7:03 am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > if the answer is gee whiz, one would then have to ask, is gee whiz a > > > > > > short form for jesus? > > > > > > > i believe u misinterpreted OM's post. i think she was agreeing with > > > > > > u. > > > > > > > just a thought...you might want to consider changing the terminology > > > > > > you use to something a bit more pallatable for the readers of your > > > > > > responses? you refer to others posts using words such as > > > > > > 'superficial, > > > > > > frenetic, without depth, simplistic interpretation, mental cache > > > > > > dump, > > > > > > etc. if one is trying to get a point across it is much better to do > > > > > > so > > > > > > without attempting to offend the other, because if u do, even if the > > > > > > words u are saying make sense, the reader will not have a good > > > > > > interpretation of the 'lesson', because they will not appreciate the > > > > > > 'teacher'...your 'meaning' doesnt have to be 'demeaning'. u have > > > > > > some > > > > > > good thoughts and comments...if they were slightly less caustic they > > > > > > might be a bit easier to swallow...again, just an observation > > > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:31 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > In your situation there is a huge difference, in that the group > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > local to your community. Actually, I don't really see the > > > > > > > comparison, > > > > > > > that would be like me hanging with the Pope and then expecting a > > > > > > > phone > > > > > > > call from the Vatican. Still, I would think that at least one > > > > > > > person > > > > > > > from the whole should reach out, there is some degree of failure > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > on their part. Let me also add that you did not just fail to > > > > > > > show up > > > > > > > the next day while recording his speeches which would/should > > > > > > > trigger a > > > > > > > concern as to your well being, I would think. > > > > > > > > Your simplistic interpretation of my approach is superficial, > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > depth. Failure to show any concern for someone who becomes part > > > > > > > of a > > > > > > > spiritual family in a local community church is a reflection of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > congregates ability to live up to the spiritual tenets that they > > > > > > > purport to espouse. I would expect, after months of > > > > > > > playing/singing > > > > > > > for the choir and receiving expressions of gratitude, for > > > > > > > gratuitousness and ability, from attendees that someone would ask > > > > > > > someone else what happened to the player/singer, with the reply > > > > > > > being, I don't know we need to call and see if all is well. It is > > > > > > > very simple really, especially when you consider that the > > > > > > > congregation > > > > > > > (not an organization) may only consist of a hundred members or > > > > > > > less. > > > > > > > So your judgment on the matter of my judgment is incorrect, > > > > > > > partially > > > > > > > because I had failed to initially present the related and relevant > > > > > > > facts. It is years ago now anyway and I haven't any affiliations > > > > > > > nor > > > > > > > need of any so it doesn't matter, but if I did I would rather > > > > > > > belong > > > > > > > to a family instead of an organization. > > > > > > > Part of the problem is the lack of instilling that sense of family > > > > > > > within the spiritual community. They take your money, your time > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > service and then you return to being a number, not a member. I > > > > > > > personally expect more from a group, any group, in which I would > > > > > > > spend > > > > > > > my time engaging in spirituality. This is one area where > > > > > > > collective > > > > > > > mentality would make a significant difference. As you say, we are > > > > > > > one, at least we should be! > > > > > > > > Thank You! > > > > > > > I rest my case. > > > > > > > > There will be a short recess and then the jury will decide the > > > > > > > verdict, unless Judge Judy calls in, and now a word from our > > > > > > > sponsors. > > > > > > > > Need a new car? Call gruff's auto! > > > > > > > > By the way, orn, is geezzz short for gee wiz or Jesus?- Hide > > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
