Thinking back. most of the professions of love I've heard have taken place in utterly stupid situations like being attacked by the beaten woman as I tossed her partner into the Paddywagon, with her now totally in love with the jerk who has been screwing her best mate behind her back for years. I suspect the nature of this crud is residual adolescence and lack of grip on reality.
On 1 May, 14:30, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Ha! Emptor caveat...a subtle twist with a great change in meaning, Rosey. > > For the artist, passion need not be externally stimulated, but can come from > within. The passion need not be chased...rather crafted, shaped, created, and > continuously cultivated. Romance is not a force of nature, but an art. Ask > Don Juan... ;-) > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:Rosey <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" > <[email protected]>Date:Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:07:20 -0700 > (PDT)Local:Thurs 30 Apr 2009 23:07Subject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the nature > of Love? > > An efficacious search for that ultimate fervor will only result in a > devastated state of unfulfillment; One's expectancy usually differs > from that of another's. There is no attainment of satisfaction when > it comes to passion; as the human being is incapable of gratifyingly > quenching such a thirst. > > Unfortunately, I too am a hopeless romantic. Emptor Caveat. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
