belief of all kinds is daft imo... well, maybe not daft since a lot of
people somehow find comfort in their beliefs... belief to me simply
means 'the lack of knowledge'...if one KNOWS something, isnt belief
redundant? ... faith and belief are 2 words that i never use to
describe my experiences

On May 20, 10:08 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Heh then I can only respond in one way.  'buck, buck, buck, buck'
>
> In all seriousness though.   I can claim that I think the moon is made
> of cheese, but without explaining how I come to such conclusion, then
> you can call me nuts.
>
> A link between emotions and imagineation?  Well maybe, I'll not rule
> it out.  But the belife that our emotions are tied in with our spirit,
> in light of all the evidance that says our emotions are in our brain,
> well that's faith based belife.
>
> Nowt wrong with that, but to my mind belife not tempered with
> rationality, well that's plain daft, innit?
>
> On 20 May, 14:52, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > i think many emotions are biological human reactions, but once spirit
> > enters the equations things change a bit and get fuzzy from my
> > experience...i think its hard to separate the two...lets see....do
> > other animals have depression, anger, or bad hair days? i really dont
> > think they do except for maybe the highly intelligent ones that have
> > been grossly mistreated. its dont think a bull is angry when it
> > attacks a matador, but simply protecting itself.
>
> > a friend of mine had his house robbed when his wife and young baby
> > were home. he also had two dobermans lying around the house who did
> > nothing. he bought an attack trained doberman and, before he had even
> > taken it home, brought it over to my house to show off this massive
> > pile of teeth. he asked me to pick up a piece of firewood and pretend
> > to attack him. i demurred but he assured me that it would be ok. he
> > had the dog on a lunge rope. i swung the log and he said 'watch'...the
> > dog was instant teeth and foam, its incisors inches from my neck.
> > right after he did that, the dog walked up to me with tail wagging and
> > we became friends...the thing wasnt mad at me at all, just doing his
> > job, but i was scared to even talk after that in case i inadvertantly
> > said the attack word!
>
> > i think our emotions are sorta tied to our imagination, and later to
> > our spirit...so i dont know how to answer your question!...its sorta a
> > soupy topic, with lots of ingredients and sometimes hard to
> > distinguish one from another...so ill plead the 5th ;-^)
>
> > On May 20, 8:12 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Ahhhh now that is a seperate thing entirly.
>
> > > No the clue as to what the spirt is, is in the word.  Spirt is spirit,
> > > or not matter.  Then some people don't beilvie in such a thing, so to
> > > take that line of argument with will not move the dialoge onwards.
>
> > > Do you tend to argue that all emotion is a function of spirt then?
>
> > > On 20 May, 12:28, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > is the spirit biological?
>
> > > > On May 20, 6:18 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Heh but then you would be wrong.
>
> > > > > Every thought and every emotion we have is purely biology, how can it
> > > > > not be?
>
> > > > > I don't think that understanding this limits the concept of love.
> > > > > Rather like understanding how a combustion engine works in no way
> > > > > invalidates peoples feelings for their cars.
>
> > > > > Do you really belive then that the more you know about any given
> > > > > subject the less 'vaule' is placed on it?  That seems ludicrus to me.
>
> > > > > On 19 May, 16:27, e_space <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > here is one of the viewers comments to the link you gave me "if love
> > > > > > is truly only biochemical cocktails of the brain then thats just 
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > the saddest thing I have ever heard. Limiting love to biology is 
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > limiting religion to anthropology. Wrong tool for the job, you are
> > > > > > truly only scratching the surface." ...i tend to agree ;-^)
>
> > > > > > On May 19, 11:18 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > 2009/5/19 e_space <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > > in my opinion, 'god' is not an entity that can be viewed or 
> > > > > > > > proven.
> > > > > > > > tell me that you have experienced love, and then prove it to 
> > > > > > > > me...see
> > > > > > > > where the problem lies?
>
> > > > > > > Not really, an MRI ought to clear up any confusion:
>
> > > > > > >http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/helen_fisher_studies_the_brain_in_...
>
> > > > > > > Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to