Granted it seems a sticky problem. It all comes back around to what is this 'I' that does the thinking? However it is easy to explain.
It is all in the head, when you are dead, then you think, nor feel, nor emote no more. It seems like certian aspects of conciouseness are outside of the body, but really they are not. It seems that way because we humans are good at taking ilogical leaps, it does seem to be the default for us. But that too is easy enough to overcome. I'm prone to the same myself, I belive in God, I know how 'unreasonable' that is, and I'm happy to admit it, and I can live with that knowledge. So I must also belive in spirit and the soul, and yes I do. However this has nothing to do with who we are, our conciousness or our personalities. And really when it comes to defineing who we are, then we are talking about personality. We know that there none of our personality resides outside of the body, or in the soul or the spirt, it is all in the head. We know this because we have many, many, many studies now showing how personality changes with head trauma. As to the true nature of what goes on in our heads, we dont know much because we have not yet learnt much. I have absolutly no doubt that one day we will know more about the workings of the brain, and then these questions will be answered. Shit I sound lke an Atheist! ;¬) On 20 May, 15:39, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > “Every thought and every emotion we have is purely biology, how can > it > not be?.... Do you really belive then that the more you know about any > given > subject the less 'vaule' is placed on it?” – lee > > Hi lee…long time… > I will assume your first question to be rhetorical. Of course, we know > from experience, not just what we believe based upon what we have read/ > seen, that emotion is of a different level than pure biology. While > our study of biology does give us some information on aspects of > emotion, such as hormones etc, it adds almost nothing as to the true > nature of emotion itself. > > On May 20, 3:18 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Heh but then you would be wrong. > > > Every thought and every emotion we have is purely biology, how can it > > not be? > > > I don't think that understanding this limits the concept of love. > > Rather like understanding how a combustion engine works in no way > > invalidates peoples feelings for their cars. > > > Do you really belive then that the more you know about any given > > subject the less 'vaule' is placed on it? That seems ludicrus to me. > > > On 19 May, 16:27, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > here is one of the viewers comments to the link you gave me "if love > > > is truly only biochemical cocktails of the brain then thats just about > > > the saddest thing I have ever heard. Limiting love to biology is like > > > limiting religion to anthropology. Wrong tool for the job, you are > > > truly only scratching the surface." ...i tend to agree ;-^) > > > > On May 19, 11:18 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 2009/5/19 e_space <[email protected]> > > > > > > in my opinion, 'god' is not an entity that can be viewed or proven. > > > > > tell me that you have experienced love, and then prove it to me...see > > > > > where the problem lies? > > > > > Not really, an MRI ought to clear up any confusion: > > > > >http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/helen_fisher_studies_the_brain_in_... > > > > > Ian- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
