Heh but then you would be wrong. Every thought and every emotion we have is purely biology, how can it not be?
I don't think that understanding this limits the concept of love. Rather like understanding how a combustion engine works in no way invalidates peoples feelings for their cars. Do you really belive then that the more you know about any given subject the less 'vaule' is placed on it? That seems ludicrus to me. On 19 May, 16:27, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > here is one of the viewers comments to the link you gave me "if love > is truly only biochemical cocktails of the brain then thats just about > the saddest thing I have ever heard. Limiting love to biology is like > limiting religion to anthropology. Wrong tool for the job, you are > truly only scratching the surface." ...i tend to agree ;-^) > > On May 19, 11:18 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 2009/5/19 e_space <[email protected]> > > > > in my opinion, 'god' is not an entity that can be viewed or proven. > > > tell me that you have experienced love, and then prove it to me...see > > > where the problem lies? > > > Not really, an MRI ought to clear up any confusion: > > >http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/helen_fisher_studies_the_brain_in_... > > > Ian- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
