Slip, you started the 'Collective Consciousness' thread after our private conversation where I said; "I got this thing in my head saying there's a way to 'hook up' everybody to the collective intelligence. I need help to bring it out and make sense out of it. That is what brought me to Mind's Eye."
You went off on the tangent from the idea I presented to you. You went straight into the 'pattern' that has to be broken for us to change the ways of Society. I am not evasive. You will not ask questions. I have presented the idea of establishing a common point of understanding as the beginning point of Unity. I have said that we need to recognize the common connection in our mind with a universal symbol for that common point of understanding. I have presented "the Feeling" as the way to recognize that connection. Please, please, please, ask a question about what you don't understand. What more do you want to know? peace & Love On Jul 9, 10:57 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would be better if you were where I am, but OK, let's start > from "square one". YOU lay out the road map, or the instructional > plan, or the owners manual to your "Unique Idea" and then "WE" can > possibly see exactly what this idea is other than an "IDEA". We were > together on the collective consciousness thread which I started but > somehow you have gone off on some obscure tangent which is void of > description and you continually remain evasive in face of membership > requests for specifics. I haven't forgotten your post long gone in > which you tell tale of your subtleties which are intentionally > antagonistic and in which you claim to have been really good at. The > cat and mouse games are boring so spell it out clearly, succinctly, > concisely and perhaps "WE" can "SEE" your "Unique" idea. So far I > don't see anything that even remotely resembles an earnest attempt > other than that of the dangling bait technique, which is by now > getting very tiring. Yesterday is gone, tomorrow is yet to come and > the future is wide open, so set the course, but at least make it > legible. > > On Jul 9, 7:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If your mind was there, you would be where I am, you are not. > > > Yes it is a unique idea, I'm sorry you can't see it. > > > If you did see it you would know how "the segment of humanity that > > "does not want unity"" would be affected by our higher power. > > > I really do appreciate your concerned guidance. I've no interest in > > becoming a martyr. > > > peace & Love > > > On Jul 9, 5:17 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm afraid that you don't seem to understand is that my mind is > > > "there", as are others. You don't have a new or exclusive idea. Get > > > off the cloud Tinker. > > > Aside from that there is a problematic mammoth starring you in the > > > face, one that you fail to address, that being the segment of humanity > > > that "does not want unity". They don't want your peace and love! > > > I think you should spend more time "talking" to them about your idea > > > in hopes that they might not consider chopping your head off and > > > putting it on the end of a pole. > > > > On Jul 8, 11:48 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The riddler has provided the answer, you do not allow your mind to > > > > explore the possibility. > > > > > We can establish a common point of understanding for Unity to begin, > > > > let your mind go there. > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > On Jul 8, 11:17 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Why bother when the riddler can simply provide the answer, something > > > > > you have yet to do, I have enough taxing my mind as it is without > > > > > entertaining your mental goads. > > > > > > On Jul 8, 9:23 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > My friend, riddles have answers if you'll let your mind explore the > > > > > > possibility :-) > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 12:52 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think riddles are your forte tink. ;-) > > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 6:27 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Not the same at all, hatred comes from denial of the connection > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > is our common link. > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 3:40 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > And in a similar vein, feelimg of the opposite. Yep I guess > > > > > > > > > we can be > > > > > > > > > united in both love and hate. > > > > > > > > > > On 7 July, 00:59, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes Lee, there is something we can all agree on. > > > > > > > > > > That is, the Feeling of the connection in our min, to that > > > > > > > > > > which is > > > > > > > > > > other than our physical realm. The Feeling of goodness, of > > > > > > > > > > Love and of > > > > > > > > > > beauty, and/or the Feeling of, cosmic consciousness and/or > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > presence of God, is something that can be established as > > > > > > > > > > the common > > > > > > > > > > link of mankind. > > > > > > > > > > It can cross the barriers of language and culture to > > > > > > > > > > establish a > > > > > > > > > > beginning point of Unity. > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 6, 8:36 am, "[email protected]" > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ohh I don't know. We are all the same species, there > > > > > > > > > > > must be > > > > > > > > > > > something that we can all agree on? > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean if I punch a German in the face, I can almost > > > > > > > > > > > garentee that the > > > > > > > > > > > look on said face will be virtualy the same as the look > > > > > > > > > > > an Egyptian > > > > > > > > > > > would give me following the same treatment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Which put another less wordy way means, we all react to > > > > > > > > > > > pain in the > > > > > > > > > > > same way, and I would guess happiness also. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 July, 23:21, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > That you doubt the inherent value of our common source > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't matter, > > > > > > > > > > > > you know it IS :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > The I Ching, the Bible, the Koran and any other > > > > > > > > > > > > theology or philosophy > > > > > > > > > > > > that pretends to teach "the way" for mankind, yes, out > > > > > > > > > > > > the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > No dogma or idealism will ever be able to cross the > > > > > > > > > > > > barriers of > > > > > > > > > > > > language and culture to establish Unity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 5, 1:11 pm, gruff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We may have started as one but we are many now and > > > > > > > > > > > > > whether we will > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever be one again remains to be seen. Yet in another > > > > > > > > > > > > > sense we are all > > > > > > > > > > > > > one since we had a common beginning but I doubt that > > > > > > > > > > > > > is of any > > > > > > > > > > > > > inherent value. Since we are many what about I > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ching? Shall we throw > > > > > > > > > > > > > I Ching out the window? (A small theft from Firesign > > > > > > > > > > > > > Theatre, mea > > > > > > > > > > > > > culpa.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 4, 3:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We need a common point for the cooperation of unity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to begin :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > peace & Love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 4, 2:15 pm, gruff <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's true Rigsy. But we're just learning those > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arts. And given a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dearth of cooperation, I'll opt for some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > co-dependency in small > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > doses. It's a reasonable substitute. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 1:41 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a big difference between co-dependency > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and co-operation.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
