Could you explain "With a universal symbol for the Feeling taught to the world"?
On Jul 30, 7:24 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > "How does one "establish a common recognition for that Feeling", when > the feelings about God are very diverse, and some actually adverse?"- > deri > > With a universal symbol for the Feeling taught to the world. > > "The word "establish" seems to indicate the enforcement of the > feeling, rather than all of society buying into a certain dogma, which > is never going to happen." - deri > > The Feeling can be identified with out dogma. It is common to mankind > as the connection in our mind that substantiates all dogmas. We need > to bridge the dogmatic God definitions (diverse/adverse) with a common > recognition of the source. > I'm talking about hooking up the power of God with a common link in > our minds. If that is done, Society will change. > > "Also, how does "cosmic consciousness" fit into some of your previous > comments about things being contained on earth?" - deri > > Like the individual experiences consciousness of the world, our > collective intelligence (Earth contained God) is conscious of the > cosmos. We have access to our collective intelligence and therefore > experience cosmic consciousness. > > peace & Love > > On Jul 30, 8:45 am, deripsni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > How does one "establish a common recognition for that Feeling", when > > the feelings about God are very diverse, and some actually adverse? > > The word "establish" seems to indicate the enforcement of the feeling, > > rather than all of society buying into a certain dogma, which is never > > going to happen. > > > Also, how does "cosmic consciousness" fit into some of your previous > > comments about things being contained on earth? > > > On Jul 29, 11:08 pm, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "How can humanity come to agreement? I posit that ‘we’ must first know > > > how we are interrelated…the actual unity of us all." - Orn > > > > The Feeling of Love, of cosmic consciousness and/or of the presence of > > > God is how 'we' are interrelated. Establishing a common recognition > > > for that Feeling could be the beginning point of Unity. > > > > peace & Love > > > > On Jul 29, 3:05 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > “…Our attempts to establish peaceful means of resolution have failed > > > > miserably because there is never a general consensus on any issue. We > > > > sanction and punish to no end in order to force change but to no > > > > avail. People are at war in every quadrant of the planet while new > > > > agitations are festering in the background waiting to emerge as full > > > > scale skirmishes.” – SD > > > > > Slip, yes, quite the situation now…as it has been forever, no? > > > > ‘We’ all change, either by agreement or force. (in this context) How > > > > can humanity come to agreement? I posit that ‘we’ must first know how > > > > we are interrelated…the actual unity of us all. Without this > > > > recognition, the rest (other than force) seems impossible. > > > > > On Jul 26, 3:22 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Are we losing the ability to reconcile in the world? Have we slipped > > > > > so far from the understanding of brotherhood, of forgiveness that we > > > > > have simply become a world of hatred and revenge. We are literally > > > > > mortified by the specter of terrorism that is plaguing the world. The > > > > > mindset of terrorism is anchored in the inability to allow forgiveness > > > > > to override anger and instead caters to hatred, anger and violence > > > > > towards those deemed the wrongdoers without regard for the harm > > > > > imposed upon the innocent bystanders. > > > > > Aside from that our culture seems entrenched in the business of > > > > > revenge, we rather employ legal means to inflict suffering upon those > > > > > who we think have done us wrong before we would sit down directly and > > > > > discuss the problems. Politics seems to be leaning more toward > > > > > instilling anger and fears among us which leads to a polarization of > > > > > society while most media seem devoted to divisive and anger driven > > > > > reporting with a general attitude of who is to blame. > > > > > Can we ever stop sending messages attached to missiles, bombs and > > > > > bullets? Our attempts to establish peaceful means of resolution have > > > > > failed miserably because there is never a general consensus on any > > > > > issue. We sanction and punish to no end in order to force change but > > > > > to no avail. People are at war in every quadrant of the planet while > > > > > new agitations are festering in the background waiting to emerge as > > > > > full scale skirmishes.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
