Ret. Jim Would the earth be able to sustain that many people when we can't seem to support what we have now, considering the availability of life sustaining resources?
On Aug 6, 3:01 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > Many of the recent threads - evolution, non-medical healing, are we in > control, Feynman's mysteries, etc. - seem to dance around on the > wavecrest of scientific discoveries. It strikes me that, given the > major scientific advances in recent decades and the increasing speed > of scientific progress, in the foreseeable future - 100 years maybe - > humans may be able to elect to live without aging. We might well be > able to maintain our bodies at age 30 or 40 or whatever as long as we > like. In other words, we might be able to choose to live forever. > If we accept that as a possibility, I wonder what sort of > philosophical issues it raises. How might our view of life and death > be changed, if at all? How would our economies adapt? Would people > still marry for life? Would it change communities? Would our > objectives - happy life, great wealth, friendships, learning, travel > etc. - change, and if so how? And how would we settle such issues? > Anyone care to pursue this thread? Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
