On 23 Aug., 18:22, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
> So you believe in "end over means?"
No, it's just an historical observation. The fact remains that
different attempts to realise alternative systemic approaches in the
Americas in the past fifty years have laboured under the disadvantage
of trying this in the teeth of obstructive US interference. The sort
of pressure that almost inevitably dooms such efforts to failure, or
to such twisting and turning in order to survive, that the orginal
vision can easily be lost. Chile is not the only example, such
considerations also play an important role in understanding Castro's
Cuba, or what was going on in El Salvador and Nicaragua during the
80s. Hugo Chavez can probably count himself lucky that Bush tied up US
power and attention so comprehensively in Iraq.
Francis
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
