Ah, but where are we to find this enemy who is not part of any human
grouping?


On Aug 23, 5:51 pm, facilitator <[email protected]> wrote:
> A simple "Common Enemy" will do.   I have understood this from past
> histories of those who would "rally the troops" to a new era.
> Perhaps, if we can pick an enemy who is not part of any human
> grouping, we might ascend to a more amicable world.
>
> On Aug 23, 11:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It's rough when one is a scholastic non conformist, arch, it doesn't
> > go over well in academia land.  Knowledge is power and mobility, of
> > course that may be simply mind over matter, does the mind overrule
> > what matters?  We can suffer consequence by misunderstanding a
> > directive, we can take a warning and view it as such or see it as an
> > issued taboo, fiat.  The whole of it all for me is illusory so I just
> > view every instance in life as a calling to gather knowledge without
> > some transcendental attachment or consequence.
> > The world as you say does not function on the knowledge base but
> > manipulation for an end result regardless of the methodology.  Though
> > the knowledge is there, as existing only, it get's over looked because
> > it interferes with the goal, it exposes ethics and morality and that's
> > a no no.  I'm often amazed how in politics, as excuses for maladies
> > seem to stem from gross ignorance, each passes the basket over to the
> > next ignorant official.  If knowledge is of use it is in the knowledge
> > that the masses are ignorant and truth can be refracted to create the
> > illusion of truth, very useful tool to ply the gullible.  This is when
> > laws become the obstacle for learning as they present a dictum to be
> > followed without consideration, they simply state "do this like
> > this".  Of course there are those who see through the veil of bull
> > crap, establish the knowledgeable challenge and initiate "war".  One's
> > truth is a lie to the other.
> > I think the problem with 101 is that it comes too little too late.  We
> > nurture our young into a world of spin to the point of dizzying
> > befuddlement then tell them that they need to learn in order to not be
> > taken advantage of by the unethical, unscrupulous predations of the
> > rule.  Sure we could start it out in early youth but that would, in
> > our P.C. world be construed as indoctrination.  Education standards
> > have plummeted when in fact they should be fine tuned and at the
> > pinnacle of world class.  Knowledge is not advantageous to the rule
> > and so they've crippled it, put blinders on the educators and
> > established the law of non-knowledge.  It's all about basic function,
> > abc, 123 with a little Spin (oza).
>
> > On Aug 23, 9:13 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I must admit I can't hack university study - something of an admission
> > > since I teach the stuff.  I'm not good at thinking the way others want
> > > me to.  However, I still broadly agree knowledge is useful and not
> > > having it generally dangerous.  Much could be debated here.  I'll
> > > chicken out a bit and put forward 'double aspect theory'.
> > > This claims that mental and physical systems are really both
> > > properties of a deeper reality which itself is neither mental nor
> > > physical.  Its most famous advocate in the West was Baruch Spinoza
> > > (1632 - 77).  Mind and matter are aspects of the same thing - 'god'.
> > > Mind and matter may be rather similar kinds of entities, one
> > > transmitting and the other receiving (Hume).  All talk of mind and
> > > matter can be reduced (Russell) to 'events' which are not
> > > instrinsically either.  Vam could no doubt point to a much longer
> > > 'Eastern' history of all this than I am capable of.  The scientific
> > > account of the physical world is quite unlike the common sense
> > > version.
>
> > > Such considerations are all very well, but we live in a world that
> > > does not respect knowledge much.  This is a world of bent politicians
> > > and all kinds of ways of influencing situations other than through
> > > truth and open demonstration.  Deception is everywhere, not least
> > > amongst those claiming to tell us the truth.  The species that
> > > uniformly claims to want peace is always at war in history.  One could
> > > say we have a 'Barbarian Temperament', yet our history is so bad we
> > > only now have the dawning glimmer that the 'Barbarians' were usually
> > > more peaceful. poetic, artistic and decent than those who delivered
> > > our history to us (Chaz was really good on this and I miss him in
> > > here).  As I write, Ponting (the greatest postwar Aussie batter) is
> > > run out - I am easily distracted by trivia.  Now Michael Clarke is run
> > > out with a fluke - a decision only giveable through modern
> > > technology.  Test Match Special can set you free!
>
> > > These cricket events are happening 'live as I write' (I do know to
> > > most they are as interesting as something better wiped off the bottom
> > > of a shoe - I imagine Gabby being so enthralled as to contemplate
> > > suicide as preferable to reading on!) - I am genuinely lifted by this
> > > obvious nonsense.  My friend Vam might well lift a metaphorical glass
> > > to celebrate his friend's delight, barely concealing how much sweeter
> > > the future revenge over this motley crew of 'born abroad' "Englishmen"
> > > will be in a later Indian Summer.
>
> > > My point, not argued, is that we need some kind of 101 of living, not
> > > philosophy.  I would turn the technology of being able to stage events
> > > to peace, to mobilise a peace that turns what is war to the trivia of
> > > cricket, knitting - something that makes the swell of pride a residual
> > > organ of an entertainment of a long lost history we can laugh at in
> > > all seriousness.  Even the human appendix is now known to have modern
> > > use ('good bacteria' hide in there when we are ill).  My 101 would
> > > contain questions about how we can form polls of peace and plenty that
> > > cannot be stolen by a few idiots with guns.  In this sense, I feel
> > > education is failing us as our young skip to school.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to