Umm there seems some flaw here, now what is it? Ahhh yes!
If I was to suggest that to manipulate where a car goes you need to use the stearing wheel, that sounds about right yes? I was to further say that a stearing wheel does not in fact stear the car, it only manipulates where the car can be steared, then maybe you'll begin to see what is wrong with your statement above? If we can manipulate our conciousness via the use of electricity and chemicals, then it is safe to assume that our conciousness uses both electricity and chemicals in order to work, yes or no? Or put in another way. If I drink a glass of water and notice no change in the way my conciousness is working then it is safe to suggest that water is not a mechinism that conciousness uses in order to work.(apart from our bodies dependancy upon it of course) On 5 Sep, 14:48, Justintruth <[email protected]> wrote: > These experiments lend a lot of experimental support to > > > consciousness being primarily chemical and electrical. > > Actually they do not. > > They just lend a lot of experimental support to consciousness being > manipulate-able through chemical and electrical manipulation of ones > brain. > > But we already knew that. All it takes is to ingest a beer (or two), > or -and I am not an advocate- ingest some LSD, and you will know. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
