"Tell him about the twinky." Dogs at least can be trained to be useful. I have as yet seen nothing in cats that is remotely useful in anyway. Indeed, there is ample evidence that they are, in fact, evil. Exhibit one:
http://www.funnyjunk.com/youtube/9720/Evil+Kitty+song/ dj On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3ZOKDmorj0 > > On Sep 9, 10:26 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> This question has been asked by all sides. Cats or dog? >> >> Cat lovers would tell you that dogs are slaves to their masters whilst >> dog lovers will tell you, no they are lovingly loyal whilst cats are >> aloof and selfish. >> >> Which do you prefer cats or dogs? Or perhaps like me you like both? >> >> Chris, in another thread mentioned the old Science vs Faith thing >> agian. >> >> Like cats and dogs I see merit and value in both of them. >> >> Science is good, it lets us understand the world around us, the >> universe, our place in it, how it all works. However I belive there >> are questions that science simply cannot answer, and so I turn to >> religious faith. >> >> Religion is also good, it lets us understand our place in the world, >> it answers the all important why question. >> >> Now I'm sure that perhaps one or two of you may be thinking, no Lee >> you are wrong there are no questions that science cannot one day >> answer, well isn't that an article of faith in itself I wonder? >> >> Here's my mantra again 'We are all differant, the whole world over'. >> These differances are becoming increaseingly important to me, along >> with what I have termed 'The right to be', now they seem to be at the >> core of a slowley(ahhh ever-so-slowly) emerging philosophy of mine. >> >> Based on the golden rule which I shall render here as 'treat others as >> you would wish to be treated', I think that many people would agree >> with such a tenant conciously or not? >> >> Taking that further then we can see that a logical extention of the >> golden rule is 'I will live my life as I see fit, within the confines >> of the law of the land'. Again I don't think many would like to >> disagree with such a thought? >> >> Taking that further still we can get 'I will suffer no attempt by >> others to enforce me to lead a life not in keeping with the life I >> wish to lead'. This then must lead us to the conclusion that if I >> wish to live by these tenants then I must extend the same to everybody >> else, the golden rule ensures this. >> >> This in a nutshell is 'the right to be'. >> >> Now bearing that in mind we can get a glimpse into why differances are >> so important to me. Yes I can point at somebody and say well I don't >> agree with your morality, but as long as it does not lead you into >> brakeing the law of the land, then I can do nothing to stop you >> leading the kind of life you wish to, nor should I attempt to do so. >> >> These differances then become important because we need to be able to >> live next to each other, I need to understand how you are differant to >> me, so that I do not mistakingly put upon you 'intent' or 'motive' >> that is just not there, thus causeing misunderstanding and illwill. >> Our differances matter so that we can learn to live side by side with >> the minimun amount of conflict. >> >> So cats or dogs, shit man why not both? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
