No, I am referring to such things as 'A cannot be and not be'. Etcetera. As provided by Russell.
If that is subjective then anything can be or not be regardless of actuality. Mathematics would crumble, language would no longer make sense. I can be really tolerant of the strange and weird aspects of concepts and ideas but subjective logic is pushing things too far. Even under Bayesian network analysis or the belief functions of Dempster-Shafer belief theory or opinion application to a collection of propositions, that can be represented as a Dirichlet distribution, which are all sometimes referred to very narrowly as 'subjective logic' because the statements measured are opinions and not argued as facts... at its root the arguments still rely on the three basic aspects of Logic which cannot be subjective without loss of all rational meaning for everything. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
