Because of its application to linguistics and philosophy I'll suggest
First-order Logic or Predicate Logic as it is sometimes called.

2009/9/11 ornamentalmind <[email protected]>:
>
> Just so I can have a clearer view of what logics you use, the “A
> cannot be and not be” that you attribute to Russell, is this the same
> thing as Aristotle’s Formal Logic? Here I am talking about his three
> axioms addressing:
> A is A (identity)
> A is not not-A (contradiction)
> A is not both A and not-A  (excluded middle)
>
> ...this can be applied in Euclidean Geometery, however if we move to
> Einstein's Geometry, the point of view becomes relativised and we lose
> universality.
>
> I'll wait to address Heisenberg until I get a response.
>
>
> On Sep 11, 10:47 am, Simon Ewins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No, I am referring to such things as 'A cannot be and not be'.
>> Etcetera. As provided by Russell.
>>
>> If that is subjective then anything can be or not be regardless of actuality.
>>
>> Mathematics would crumble, language would no longer make sense. I can
>> be really tolerant of  the strange and weird aspects of concepts and
>> ideas but subjective logic is pushing things too far.
>>
>> Even under Bayesian network analysis or the belief functions of
>> Dempster-Shafer belief theory or opinion application to a collection
>> of propositions, that can be represented as a Dirichlet distribution,
>> which are all sometimes referred to very narrowly as 'subjective
>> logic' because the statements measured are opinions and not argued as
>> facts... at its root the arguments still rely on the three basic
>> aspects of Logic which cannot be subjective without loss of all
>> rational meaning for everything.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to