For me, when given the choice between Acorn, Wall Street and the
Lotto, I will take Acorn. They take less tax payer money.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/27983.html


On Oct 6, 3:52 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's like Orn says, anybody that plays the lotto and actually thinks
> they have a snowballs chance are really bad at math.  But I confess
> when our 'power ball" was over 350 million a few months ago I bought a
> ticket.  Even at 15 million to one odds I got a little thrill and had
> a good half hour discussion with my partner at work on what we'd do
> with all that smack if we won.  Well worth the buck I'd say.
>
> You are right of course.  I know I don't know what it's like to be
> desperate and poor.  I have never experienced it.  I have ALWAYS had
> the option to move in with Mom and Dad or stay with my brother or even
> crash at a friends house when times were dicey.  Even then I had
> savings I could have burned to tide me over for a few months to find a
> new job.  It's how I was taught; Be prepared.  I've never been fired
> but was laid off after the IRS shut down the store I was managing.  I
> moved in with Mom and Dad for a few months.  Trust me; that was
> harrowing enough I never wanted to do it again.  Now, 22 years later
> they are moving in with me.
>
> It frustrates me that we have organizations like Acorn that are set up
> to teach people to rob the system.  I wish we could motivate people to
> start their own business and hire people and do community service
> rather then promote fraud.  The Chamber of Commerce is a good start
> but something tells me the slums don't have a very effective branch.
> The over all sense of entitlement in these communities is mind
> boggling.  I would love to give them a hand up but too often it seems
> this is not what they are looking for.  At least that's the way it
> appears to me.  Granted, options for the poor are limited.  But in
> this country there are a lot more then in many others.  Just removing
> the temptations of easy money provided by thievery or drug sales would
> vastly improve these communities.  I have found that those that live
> in these type communities tend to enable this behavior by not
> reporting crimes.  The police become the bad guys.  Lee, tell me if
> I'm wrong.
>
> dj
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It is a lot more complex that what you are presenting Don.  There is a
> > deeper psychological aspect to be concerned with.  Poor people who
> > lose their lotto winnings don't have financial backgrounds, they don't
> > come from a family of bankers, have friends who are wall street
> > tycoons or have top notch advisers.  Instead they go out thinking they
> > are rich to no end and spend their way into the ditch as well as much
> > of the time getting 'ripped off' by shady investors.  Of course you
> > must know that the majority of winners retain most of their new found
> > wealth.   The mental condition of a person receiving assistance has a
> > great deal to do with their own success in life, chances are if you
> > gave a bag lady 10 G's, all you would have is a bag lady with 10 G's,
> > obviously she has issues that have sustained her bag lady lifestyle.
> > But let 's look at the ghetto problem and growing up in such
> > deplorable conditions.  That has to have an impact on a child growing
> > up, the security factor alone, living in fear, health issues from
> > living amongst the filth and vermin.  The totality of the environment
> > becomes a microcosm of perpetuated detriment.  They are well aware of
> > their plight and can see the world about with all it's grandeur but
> > only see themselves in it in the form of a dream.  So what little they
> > have becomes the only thing that is left to fight for, as there really
> > isn't much left of personal dignity.  I'm sure the kids in your
> > neighborhood are not living under the same conditions and as a result
> > have a different outlook on life, they see a future and have security,
> > parents who can nurture them in ways that can lead them upwards.  From
> > the time they are born they are on the road to a successful future and
> > even sometimes the affluent can have their share of failures.  It's
> > the same anywhere else.  What are the chances of attaining wealth when
> > you are a 'slum dog'?  If I won lotto I would never go poor, it's all
> > about common sense, self control and good math.
>
> > On Oct 5, 9:53 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> You can't spend your way out poverty Slip.  Statistics show a
> >> surprising number of poor people that win the lottery and take the
> >> cash option(generally the smarter move) are broke 10 years later.  We
> >> can build all the tenements and projects we want and those places will
> >> invariably return to trash in the near future because some people just
> >> won't help themselves.  When apathy is rewarded it makes it difficult
> >> for some to see the benefits in working themselves into a better way
> >> of life when all they need is provided gratis.  I personally feel it's
> >> morally wrong.
>
> >> By the way.  Violence IS a solution.  Very often it is the most
> >> economical and effective solution.  This is why it will continue to be
> >> implemented by individuals and governments until the end of time.  It
> >> just so happens it makes me sick to my stomach.
>
> >> dj
>
> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Cynical?
>
> >> > Woestehoff says this investigation is long overdue. She complains that
> >> > wealthy and well-connected parents have long-been throwing around
> >> > their clout on behalf of their children. The rules ought to be the
> >> > same for everybody. But, you know, this is Chicago. And we know that
> >> > in Chicago there’s an expectation that a certain group of people who
> >> > have power will be able to get their children into any school.
> >> > Unqualified students who have parents with clout aren’t just attending
> >> > public high schools. The issue has also plagued top officials at the
> >> > University of Illinois in recent months. They’re accused of admitting
> >> > hundreds of unqualified students. The scandal involves the president
> >> > of the university along with many high-ranking elected officials.
> >> > A state panel investigating the admissions process recently
> >> > recommended every trustee on the board resign and yesterday, the
> >> > chairman of the board did just that.
>
> >> >http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/Content.aspx?audioID=35938
>
> >> > Absurd?
>
> >> > Admissions clout clearly thrived in places where families were
> >> > politically savvy and well-positioned to tap into connections with
> >> > elected officials and university trustees, said educators and other
> >> > observers.
> >> > Just how skewed was the campus clout list? Half of the 616 Illinois
> >> > students who received preferential treatment from 2005 to 2009
> >> > graduated from just 22 high schools, all but one in the metro area.
> >> > Meanwhile, at least 668 Illinois high schools had no clouted
> >> > applicants at all.
>
> >> >http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-clout-schools-17-jul17,0...
>
> >> > There's more as you must know.  I didn't apply anything to the world
> >> > at large, clearly the elite school comment was pertinent to Chicago
> >> > but I will admit that I think it does go on in other parts of the
> >> > country and the world.  Besides, you should understand that I'm
> >> > addressing the fact that poverty, while there are exceptions, is a
> >> > nurtured aspect of the world.  It's Marx distinction between the
> >> > powerful and the powerless, the establishment of a social strata which
> >> > is prevalent in many parts of the world, fact is I don't know of any
> >> > off hand that function without it, some are worst than others.  Truth
> >> > is if the world sincerely wanted to rid itself of poverty it would
> >> > end.  Bulldozers would raze the ghettos and decent affordable housing
> >> > would be built, bankrupt farms would be financially rescued, revived
> >> > and enabled to productive feed the world acreage, the same goes for
> >> > much of the failed small business's that translate into jobs. But of
> >> > course that wouldn't be all too profitable to the stock market,
> >> > investment capitalists and bankers.  Better the not so 'well to do'
> >> > bail them out when they need help, no?  Isn't it all so obvious, or is
> >> > is just me?
>
> >> > On Oct 5, 6:11 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> Chicago's elite public schools, the ones that parents are bedding with
> >> >> aristocracy in exchange for their kids enrollment.
>
> >> >> very cynical, Slip.  Inner city schools have additional problems that
> >> >> come with poverty, there is not doubt about that.  But to state that
> >> >> other schools in any state provide more services because parents are
> >> >> bedding with aristocracy is, well, absurd.  You seem to take the worst
> >> >> case scenario and apply it to the world at large.
>
> >> >> On Oct 5, 6:26 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >> > Well Molly, your examples merely confirm my comment that "little"
> >> >> > effort is made.  I wouldn't say that the examples reflect a great deal
> >> >> > of effort.  Sure there are organizations that combat numerous problems
> >> >> > but overall results are insignificant.  Things haven't really changed
> >> >> > all that much, have they?
>
> >> >> > I'm not assuming that "all" children are experiencing the same thing
> >> >> > and I would think you should know better than that.  Of course there
> >> >> > are better schools, better standards and better students.  I'm simply
> >> >> > addressing the obvious problems.  It wouldn't make sense to talk about
> >> >> > Chicago's elite public schools, the ones that parents are bedding with
> >> >> > aristocracy in exchange for their kids enrollment.  It's about inner
> >> >> > city mentality and the mentality of those who contribute to the
> >> >> > development of inner cities across the country and around the world.
>
> >> >> > On Oct 5, 1:15 pm, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to