Besides what do these odds really mean?  I have been told that there
is a bigger chance of my hurting myself in a DIY accident, then
getting hit by a car, yet I still practice the green cross code when I
have to cross the road.  Somebody somewhere wins the lotto almolst
every week.

Not I though, I really don't do it, come to think of it, I really
don't do DIY either.

On 7 Oct, 04:32, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don, it's not about lotto but the reality, even for you, that social
> mobility is highly dependent on several factors including but not
> limited to having money.  Having money is worthless without the "where
> with all"  to know what to do with it.   Odds?  What are your odds of
> having dinner with the upper crust of society?  You see? You might be
> like trailer trash to the people "Up There".
> It's the view from the window of a three story tenement in the ghetto
> that lay the odds of "Having Dinner", going to college and living a
> life that is in the least decent and not substandard slum dog
> squalor.
> For sure the odds are high in any lotto or scratch off game and many
> people win small sums but what would you do with $189 
> million?http://www.huliq.com/8326/87275/powerball-winner-florida-hits-193m-ja...
>
> On Oct 6, 8:38 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Didn't know the Lotto took any tax payer money.  I love it.  Helps
> > keep my property taxes from rising.  The Lotto is funded by Hope and
> > Stupidity.  Frankly, they pay out more hope dividends then the other
> > purveyor of Hope, Barrack Obama.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGrbM-7YH9k
>
> > I don't know what's funnier, the SNL skit or CNN's 'fact check' of a
> > comedy routine.  Reading the comments below the video is enlightening.
> >  Could this be a representation of what America thinks of our current
> > president?  Naaaah.
>
> > dj
>
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
>
> > > For me, when given the choice between Acorn, Wall Street and the
> > > Lotto, I will take Acorn. They take less tax payer money.
>
> > >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/27983.html
>
> > > On Oct 6, 3:52 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> It's like Orn says, anybody that plays the lotto and actually thinks
> > >> they have a snowballs chance are really bad at math.  But I confess
> > >> when our 'power ball" was over 350 million a few months ago I bought a
> > >> ticket.  Even at 15 million to one odds I got a little thrill and had
> > >> a good half hour discussion with my partner at work on what we'd do
> > >> with all that smack if we won.  Well worth the buck I'd say.
>
> > >> You are right of course.  I know I don't know what it's like to be
> > >> desperate and poor.  I have never experienced it.  I have ALWAYS had
> > >> the option to move in with Mom and Dad or stay with my brother or even
> > >> crash at a friends house when times were dicey.  Even then I had
> > >> savings I could have burned to tide me over for a few months to find a
> > >> new job.  It's how I was taught; Be prepared.  I've never been fired
> > >> but was laid off after the IRS shut down the store I was managing.  I
> > >> moved in with Mom and Dad for a few months.  Trust me; that was
> > >> harrowing enough I never wanted to do it again.  Now, 22 years later
> > >> they are moving in with me.
>
> > >> It frustrates me that we have organizations like Acorn that are set up
> > >> to teach people to rob the system.  I wish we could motivate people to
> > >> start their own business and hire people and do community service
> > >> rather then promote fraud.  The Chamber of Commerce is a good start
> > >> but something tells me the slums don't have a very effective branch.
> > >> The over all sense of entitlement in these communities is mind
> > >> boggling.  I would love to give them a hand up but too often it seems
> > >> this is not what they are looking for.  At least that's the way it
> > >> appears to me.  Granted, options for the poor are limited.  But in
> > >> this country there are a lot more then in many others.  Just removing
> > >> the temptations of easy money provided by thievery or drug sales would
> > >> vastly improve these communities.  I have found that those that live
> > >> in these type communities tend to enable this behavior by not
> > >> reporting crimes.  The police become the bad guys.  Lee, tell me if
> > >> I'm wrong.
>
> > >> dj
>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > It is a lot more complex that what you are presenting Don.  There is a
> > >> > deeper psychological aspect to be concerned with.  Poor people who
> > >> > lose their lotto winnings don't have financial backgrounds, they don't
> > >> > come from a family of bankers, have friends who are wall street
> > >> > tycoons or have top notch advisers.  Instead they go out thinking they
> > >> > are rich to no end and spend their way into the ditch as well as much
> > >> > of the time getting 'ripped off' by shady investors.  Of course you
> > >> > must know that the majority of winners retain most of their new found
> > >> > wealth.   The mental condition of a person receiving assistance has a
> > >> > great deal to do with their own success in life, chances are if you
> > >> > gave a bag lady 10 G's, all you would have is a bag lady with 10 G's,
> > >> > obviously she has issues that have sustained her bag lady lifestyle.
> > >> > But let 's look at the ghetto problem and growing up in such
> > >> > deplorable conditions.  That has to have an impact on a child growing
> > >> > up, the security factor alone, living in fear, health issues from
> > >> > living amongst the filth and vermin.  The totality of the environment
> > >> > becomes a microcosm of perpetuated detriment.  They are well aware of
> > >> > their plight and can see the world about with all it's grandeur but
> > >> > only see themselves in it in the form of a dream.  So what little they
> > >> > have becomes the only thing that is left to fight for, as there really
> > >> > isn't much left of personal dignity.  I'm sure the kids in your
> > >> > neighborhood are not living under the same conditions and as a result
> > >> > have a different outlook on life, they see a future and have security,
> > >> > parents who can nurture them in ways that can lead them upwards.  From
> > >> > the time they are born they are on the road to a successful future and
> > >> > even sometimes the affluent can have their share of failures.  It's
> > >> > the same anywhere else.  What are the chances of attaining wealth when
> > >> > you are a 'slum dog'?  If I won lotto I would never go poor, it's all
> > >> > about common sense, self control and good math.
>
> > >> > On Oct 5, 9:53 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> You can't spend your way out poverty Slip.  Statistics show a
> > >> >> surprising number of poor people that win the lottery and take the
> > >> >> cash option(generally the smarter move) are broke 10 years later.  We
> > >> >> can build all the tenements and projects we want and those places will
> > >> >> invariably return to trash in the near future because some people just
> > >> >> won't help themselves.  When apathy is rewarded it makes it difficult
> > >> >> for some to see the benefits in working themselves into a better way
> > >> >> of life when all they need is provided gratis.  I personally feel it's
> > >> >> morally wrong.
>
> > >> >> By the way.  Violence IS a solution.  Very often it is the most
> > >> >> economical and effective solution.  This is why it will continue to be
> > >> >> implemented by individuals and governments until the end of time.  It
> > >> >> just so happens it makes me sick to my stomach.
>
> > >> >> dj
>
> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > Cynical?
>
> > >> >> > Woestehoff says this investigation is long overdue. She complains 
> > >> >> > that
> > >> >> > wealthy and well-connected parents have long-been throwing around
> > >> >> > their clout on behalf of their children. The rules ought to be the
> > >> >> > same for everybody. But, you know, this is Chicago. And we know that
> > >> >> > in Chicago there’s an expectation that a certain group of people who
> > >> >> > have power will be able to get their children into any school.
> > >> >> > Unqualified students who have parents with clout aren’t just 
> > >> >> > attending
> > >> >> > public high schools. The issue has also plagued top officials at the
> > >> >> > University of Illinois in recent months. They’re accused of 
> > >> >> > admitting
> > >> >> > hundreds of unqualified students. The scandal involves the president
> > >> >> > of the university along with many high-ranking elected officials.
> > >> >> > A state panel investigating the admissions process recently
> > >> >> > recommended every trustee on the board resign and yesterday, the
> > >> >> > chairman of the board did just that.
>
> > >> >> >http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/Content.aspx?audioID=35938
>
> > >> >> > Absurd?
>
> > >> >> > Admissions clout clearly thrived in places where families were
> > >> >> > politically savvy and well-positioned to tap into connections with
> > >> >> > elected officials and university trustees, said educators and other
> > >> >> > observers.
> > >> >> > Just how skewed was the campus clout list? Half of the 616 Illinois
> > >> >> > students who received preferential treatment from 2005 to 2009
> > >> >> > graduated from just 22 high schools, all but one in the metro area.
> > >> >> > Meanwhile, at least 668 Illinois high schools had no clouted
> > >> >> > applicants at all.
>
> > >> >> >http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-clout-schools-17-jul17,0...
>
> > >> >> > There's more as you must know.  I didn't apply anything to the world
> > >> >> > at large, clearly the elite school comment was pertinent to Chicago
> > >> >> > but I will admit that I think it does go on in other parts of the
> > >> >> > country and the world.  Besides, you should understand that I'm
> > >> >> > addressing the fact that poverty, while there are exceptions, is a
> > >> >> > nurtured aspect of the world.  It's Marx distinction between the
> > >> >> > powerful and the powerless, the establishment of a social strata 
> > >> >> > which
> > >> >> > is prevalent in many parts of the world, fact is I don't know of any
> > >> >> > off hand that function without it, some- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to