If nothing else we've had the pleasure of the US right attempting to
pass this off as a European insult aimed at them.  If only they knew
how impossible it is for Europe to agree on anything, and still less
its left (in power where? - discounting the lame-duck CIA Blair
coalition in the UK), they'd have invaded by sending a couple of
platoons of marines on holiday.  Most Brits would vote Republican as
long as the Queen was kept as head of state (or one of her corgis) -
some of us might even join the outfit to stop it being so mamby-pamby
on drinking policy in the Navy - what no rum ration!  Let's face it
we're so broke over here we'd do anything for a bit of bush.  You even
have a more acceptable (not much) national anthem.  Now's the time
guys - the Square Heads are holding hands again and getting very nasty
when we throw them off sun-loungers in Ibiza.  Send a tank over to the
White House, claim some pregnant chads and declare Britain the 51st
State.  Put up that guy McCain again - we'll vote in droves - he makes
all the chips ...

On 9 Oct, 22:56, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> …welcome Neil.
>
> And, yes, love is blind in many ways. I don’t doubt that almost to a
> person we each have similar stories. I know I do. I am quite lucky
> that my wife of over 3 decades still embraces Emma Goldman and votes
> 3rd party members! :-)
>
> On Oct 9, 6:58 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for information about Dennis Orn - one has to hope some can
> > survive our jungle.  I want to believe in Obama, but frankly don't.
> > It's so difficult to imagine anyone can survive our political party
> > systems (anywhere) and remain an OK person.  Our own MP and
> > councillors are pathetic in a way Obama is not - the corruption is at
> > very low levels.  It might be interesting to poll on whether any of us
> > really do know any politicians like 'Orn's Dennis'.  I was in a
> > relationship with a government minister some years back (argh! my
> > future is all behind me!), having known her as a political activist
> > years before (I was on the 'other side' then despite my leftie
> > leanings).  I had really liked her and we almost married.  She turned
> > out to be utterly useless other than in feathering her own nest once
> > she was on the inside track, all the democratic politics forgotten
> > (was it ever real?) - and I still quake at my own deception.  We met
> > fairly recently as she did talk about the old days and how the
> > 'corruption' got to her.  This wasn't much different from what some
> > old cops say about being on the inside of things and it being disloyal
> > to make them public.  It was a difficult meeting as I still tend to
> > see her as I did then and it's rather swooning.  I've never felt she
> > was just an opportunist, but even the union road is littered with
> > turncoats.  We held hands and laughed at some documentary footage of
> > the enemy (here the Conservative Party) doing much the kind of local
> > case work with crime and domestic violence victims she used to get me
> > into - the laughs being about the 180 degree turn in who was doing
> > this.  There were some tears about where the compassion went, some
> > talk of means to ends and being convinced everything was too
> > complicated once you had to do deals.
>
> > I've just turned down a job in Iran (partly because I'm not fit to
> > cope but also because I can't see me doing any good and some fears on
> > personal safety).  I think answers might lie in international project
> > collaborations - on farming, construction, education, policing -
> > because 'ordinary' people are the only answer.  Here, I think (say)
> > that Vam and I swapping 'duties' and countries with our families could
> > do more good than the 'Noble' stuff, if enough of us could do it and
> > there must be some virtual way into this on a large scale. I suppose,
> > simplified to the extreme, I think we could change leadership by being
> > able to ignore it.  Vam and I could swap without fear of the English
> > Defence League or its Indian equivalent - but there are parts of the
> > world this is not true of.  Withering away this kind of idiocy (which
> > is not just abject racism) would also wither away the need for that
> > part of the State that 'protects' us from it.
>
> > The Ignobles have become all-too-Noble these days Don.  We'd have to
> > refuse one!  Changeri was in the frame for the Nobel (Zimbabwe) and we
> > don't really know if he is just a Mugabe in waiting.  Kissinger got it
> > for ending a war that was still going on he had expanded into other
> > countries.  Maybe Obama shouldn't have been humbled and insisted he is
> > too worthy to accept?
>
> > On 9 Oct, 13:27, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Picked with a two week resume, he joins the Nobel club with such
> > > luminaries as Jimmy Carter and Yassir Arafat.  How fitting.  Dividends
> > > from the World Apology Tour '09.
>
> > > Time to expand on that Ignobel list Archy.
>
> > > dj
>
> > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:18 AM, frantheman <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > So, the prize committee chooses Obama, less than a year after he has
> > > > begun to operate on the world stage, before many concrete results have
> > > > been seen.
>
> > > > Spontaneously, I see this as a gesture of thankfulness and hope;
> > > > thankfulness to the American people that they have elected a successor
> > > > to Bush, a man who did so much global damage, a successor who works
> > > > with different visions and ideal-structures, a more positive
> > > > fundamental view of what it means to be human and what societies
> > > > (local, national and global) can and should be doing and achieving.
>
> > > > Hope that he will realise some of this vision and trust that his
> > > > country and the world puts in him. The past few months have made me a
> > > > little concerned that the experts and lobbyists, advisors and
> > > > professional analysts are wearing him down with detail and
> > > > realpolitik.
>
> > > > Maybe this award will strengthen that "Yes, we can" impetus, in the
> > > > face of the everyday inertia of the thousand arguments of
> > > > complicatedness against changing anything, against daring to hope.
>
> > > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to