A Journey of a Thousand Miles Begins With the 
First Step









The majority of those opposed to Obama winning the award are not anti Obama so 
much as they question the selection committees' timing. Premature is the word 
most associated with those who question the judges' judgment. Clearly it 
depends on one's perspective as to how the process that potentially results in 
peace comes about.

Between any noble idea and its realization is a continuum of incremental steps.

The idea of peace is a universal goal for most people who share the common 
ethic of live and let live. Doesn't everyone share that ethic? Of course we 
know that the answer to this question is a resounding no.

Unfortunately for man and woman kind there have always been and perhaps will 
always be those twisted, brutish, bullies who know how to grab power and 
sustain it - often by declaring war on a projected enemy.

These so called 'leaders' appear to be clones of each other - karmically joined 
at their political hips - schooled in the same university - majoring in the 
same courses in sadistic rule by fear and intimidation - always knowing who to 
choose to fill the ranks of their legions of henchmen who apparently love to 
make war as if it was a blood sport - ...

And once unleashed war begets war and the cycle of revenge sweeps everyone near 
the circle of destruct
ion into its orbit until both sides eventually get exhausted or one side 
prevails and peace breaks out - for a while - until the cycle starts up once 
again -

And in the middle of this collective insanity are the innocent who are always 
too ill, or too poor, or too untrained to be able to adequately protect 
themselves. These people are the legions of displaced, starved, tented, pushed 
around, the fodder for all sorts of unspeakable crimes against humanity - who 
when beaten down enough - completely lose their spirit and sink into apathy, 
helplessness and hopelessness.

But they do have one potential weapon which if realized could inevitably run 
the oppressors out of town so to speak.... This weapon is their potential unity 
of purpose - their collective yearning for peace.

But to get them to the point where they will collectively rise up and be heard 
making their power felt - their spirit has to be re-ignited... They have to be 
inspired - they have to experience hope...

Segue to Obama -

Every so often in world history there is a voice that resonates with the 
majority of peace loving human beings setting fire to their lost spark of hope 
- Once re - lit  this spark has a way of creating mass movements.

President Obama has that voice - and is using it effectively.

In only nine months he has managed to undo the great damage done by our last 
bush-league administration - breathing fresh air into a poisonous atmosphere - 
talking real talk: direct - candid - frank - 
honest - truthful talk - that is igniting the spirit of multitudes of the 
worlds' most oppressed people.

The President himself understands all too well that this prize is a call for 
futher dedication along the road to peace of which he has made a spectacular 
beginning. In his campaigne he indicated that if elected he would set to do 
nothing less than help to change the world - In my opinion he is on course to 
doing exactly what he said he wanted to do. In my opinion, the choice for the 
peace prize  at this particualr time could not have gone to a more deserving 
recipient.









-----Original Message-----
From: iam deheretic <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, Oct 10, 2009 5:09 pm
Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize


he has my support and prayers
Allan


On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:34 PM, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:


The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded annually "to the person who shall
have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations,
for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding
and promotion of peace congresses."

I have to ask, Mr. Johnson, why do you only highlight what are even
questionable undeserving recipients?  Why do you point up only the
negative?  Is it your purpose to defeat anything good?  At times your
writing sounds like it?

But that's all right.  I'll counterbalance.

Among the more notable winners in the 114 years history of the Nobel
prize are
 the following:

Theodore Roosevelt
Louis Renault
Woodrow Wilson
Frank B. Kellogg
Jane Addams
(Not so ironically, the committee awarded no peace prize in 1939,
1940, 1941, 1942 and 1943.  The award in 1944 was given to the
International Red Cross.)
Cordell Hull
Albert Schweitzer
Dag Hammarskjöld
Linus Carl Pauling
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Henry A. Kissinger
Lê Ðuc Tho (refused award)
Mohamed Anwar Al-Sadat
Menachem Begin
Mother Teresa
Lech Wałęsa
Desmond Mpilo Tutu
The 14th Dalai Lama
Desmond Mpilo Tutu
Nelson Mandela
Frederik Willem de Klerk
Yitzhak Rabin
Shimon Peres
Jody Williams
Kofi Annan
Shirin Ebadi
Mohamed ElBaradei
Al Gore

According to the Nobel committee Barack Obama Was awarded the Peace
prize "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international
diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."  No one can deny his
efforts and he may win it again for his future successes in this
goal.

It is my hope and belief that he will achieve these goals.


On Oct 9, 5:27 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Picked with a two week resume, he joins the Nobel club with such
> luminaries as Jimmy Carter and Yassir Arafat.  How fitting.  Dividends
> from the World Apology Tour '09.
>
> Time to expand on that Ignobel list Archy.
>
> dj














-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to