gabby did not use the words indifference or detachment. you misinterpreted my response to her. I was not telling her she that her words were wrong. I made a statement about detachment that I believe to be true.
On Jan 17, 12:27 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the distinction seems difficult for you to grasp: She was not > using the word creatively, neither in prose nor poetry. She told > someone else that they were using the wrong definition. IN OTHER WORDS > you should have addressed this to the person telling others that they > are wrong, not the person responding to the person that wrongly did > so. She was not "using the word as she wished," she was telling > someone else that they used a word incorrectly. > Here let me help: > From vam to molly: > > >It was quite within liberties we each have in using > > words as we would, in the manner we would, in order to express what we > > wish. > > > In fact, personally, I prefer people who have the capability to use > > words creatively ! I consider them far more evolved, endowed and > > intelligent, balanced and proportionate, than the bloke who roots for > > the puritan. > > On Jan 17, 10:15 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > " ... introduced a completely unrelated and irrelevant definition." > > > I believe you are taking things too personal and too far. Words mean > > less and and less as how they are defined by the dictionary, unless it > > keeps up to date with their usage, as what people mean when they use > > them. > > > No, I did not find Molly's usage of the word as " completely unrelated > > and irrelevant." > > > On Jan 17, 10:57 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ordinarily I wouldn't have brought out a dictionary, but two > > > statements were made about a definition. > > > Statements: > > > a) The true definition of that word is not the definition of that > > > word. > > > b) This completely unrelated definition is the real definition of that > > > word. > > > > If I were to state that beef is not really the flesh of an animal and > > > then I assert that it is instead an iron and nickel alloy, I would > > > expect a dictionary definition to be introduced. She didn't simply try > > > to " approaches words in our own unique way" she told someone that > > > used the word correctly that they were wrong and introduced a > > > completely unrelated and irrelevant definition. > > > > On Jan 16, 9:24 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It is all too common to resort to dictionaries in groups like this…it > > > > happens a lot here too. However, to keep away from less productive > > > > chatter, as apparently irrational as it may appear, often we just > > > > accept that each of us and do > > > > our best to empathize with others and how they use the language too. > > > > > This in no way is meant to suggest that apparently improper use of > > > > terms should not be pointed out…I think they should. It’s more to > > > > point out what is a deeper goal than just reading dictionaries. The > > > > truth is that almost all words have countless meanings and often lead > > > > to misunderstandings…when used by one in a specific way and heard by > > > > another as a different definition. > > > > > I just attempt to decode…read between the lines…etc. doing my best at > > > > getting to the ‘heart of the matter’…that which in fact is intended > > > > rather than arguing about term usage. But, that is only me. > > > > > On Jan 16, 7:34 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > And regardless has absolutely nothing to do with love without > > > > > expectations of a return. > > > > > > On Jan 16, 6:54 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Detachment is also used in love relationships and is very much a > > > > > > part > > > > > > of al-anon tactics when dealing with a drunk or druggie. > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 4:35 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > That is not detachment. > > > > > > > > de·tach·ment (d-tchmnt) > > > > > > > n. > > > > > > > 1. The act or process of disconnecting or detaching; separation. > > > > > > > 2. The state of being separate or detached. > > > > > > > 3. Indifference to or remoteness from the concerns of others; > > > > > > > aloofness: preserved a chilly detachment in his relations with the > > > > > > > family. > > > > > > > 4. Absence of prejudice or bias; disinterest: strove to maintain > > > > > > > her > > > > > > > professional detachment in the case. > > > > > > > 5. > > > > > > > a. The dispatch of a military unit, such as troops or ships, from > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > larger body for a special duty or mission. > > > > > > > b. The unit so dispatched. > > > > > > > c. A permanent unit, usually smaller than a platoon, organized for > > > > > > > special duties. > > > > > > > > If you notice, indifference is indeed a part of detachment when > > > > > > > involving relationships, not love. > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 2:19 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Detachment is not indifference. Detachment is love without > > > > > > > > expecting > > > > > > > > anything in return and without self importance > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 12:24 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is what you do - fair enough for now. > > > > > > > > > > I don't believe that ignorance is a bliss, though. > > > > > > > > > > On 16 Jan., 17:56, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I don't worry about it. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 10:41 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't know but found articlestree.com on the wiki > > > > > > > > > > > site and went > > > > > > > > > > > there to discover the YouTube issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think internet piracy and infringement is going to take > > > > > > > > > > > place > > > > > > > > > > > because we are in International waters where anything > > > > > > > > > > > goes and > > > > > > > > > > > establishing liability, initiating prosecution procedures > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > culminate to a satisfactory end are highly unlikely. Its > > > > > > > > > > > not much > > > > > > > > > > > different from the phishing scams originating out of > > > > > > > > > > > foreign > > > > > > > > > > > countries. What are we to do about someone in Nigeria > > > > > > > > > > > pirating our > > > > > > > > > > > work, zilch! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 8:59 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The above citation was (as referenced parenthetically) > > > > > > > > > > > > from the last > > > > > > > > > > > > thread on the subject, and the words were gruff's, not > > > > > > > > > > > > mine, and I am > > > > > > > > > > > > not sure where he got the legal sitings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not use any comments when a participant has > > > > > > > > > > > > requested that I do > > > > > > > > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 8:34 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The unauthorized use of text content can be a form of > > > > > > > > > > > > > copyright > > > > > > > > > > > > > infringement. It is common on the world wide web for > > > > > > > > > > > > > text to be copied > > > > > > > > > > > > > from one site to another without consent of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > author. Roberta Beach > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jacobson criticizes the misappropriation of writers' > > > > > > > > > > > > > work by websites > > > > > > > > > > > > > in her article Copyrights and Wrongs. This article > > > > > > > > > > > > > was added to > > > > > > > > > > > > > articlestree.com[8] on November 27, 2001; ironically, > > > > > > > > > > > > > it has since > > > > > > > > > > > > > been copied to hundreds of websites,[9] many of them > > > > > > > > > > > > > claiming > > > > > > > > > > > > > copyright over the work or charging money to access > > > > > > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 ^ Jacobson, Roberta Beach (2001-11-27). "Copyrights > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wrongs".www.articlestree.com.http://www.articlestree.com/copywriting/copyrigh....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Retrieved 2007-04-07. > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9 ^ "Results 1 - 10 of about 371 for "Roberta Beach > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jacobson" > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Copyrights and > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wrongs"".www.google.com.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Roberta+Beach+Jacobs....... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Retrieved 2007-04-07. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement#Text > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It wasn't an intention to establish lawsuit but > > > > > > > > > > > > > merely a cease and > > > > > > > > > > > > > desist declaration. "Potentially" a compilation of > > > > > > > > > > > > > copied texts can > > > > > > > > > > > > > form a published work with all copyright reservations > > > > > > > > > > > > > thereby > > > > > > > > > > > > > rendering it as having monetary value. You could > > > > > > > > > > > > > easily compile (not > > > > > > > > > > > > > implying intent) the copied ME posts and put together > > > > > > > > > > > > > any form of > > > > > > > > > > > > > marketable material. Establishing reserved rights to > > > > > > > > > > > > > my personal work > > > > > > > > > > > > > gives me the opportunity to compile my own work for > > > > > > > > > > > > > integration within > > > > > > > > > > > > > another body of material, therefore the work does > > > > > > > > > > > > > have monetary value > > > > > > > > > > > > > when considering authorship aside from the what you > > > > > > > > > > > > > have labeled as a > > > > > > > > > > > > > diminutive value of personal ego. The laws are > > > > > > > > > > > > > complex and subject to > > > > > > > > > > > > > a myriad of interpretations adding to the difficulty > > > > > > > > > > > > > of establishing > > > > > > > > > > > > > laws concerning electronic information and the > > > > > > > > > > > > > copying and exchange of > > > > > > > > > > > > > such information. Who would buy books if they were > > > > > > > > > > > > > just so easy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > copy from some Internet site? This is the crux of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider YouTube's use of and distribution of > > > > > > > > > > > > > material and the > > > > > > > > > > > > > implications. (scroll down for the article) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.articlestree.com/Legal/youtube-could-be-liable-for-copyrig... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again it is simply a cease and desist declaration not > > > > > > > > > > > > > a prelude to > > > > > > > > > > > > > legal remedies for infringement nor is it a complaint > > > > > > > > > > > > > as perceived by > > > > > > > > > > > > > Twirlip in the post above. I think you understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 6:54 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be completely accurate, I began at Minds Eye > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asking individuals for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > permission, was told by the Mods that was not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > necessary because the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > posts here were public domain, so stopped. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sometime later, the public > > > > > > > > > > > > > > domain issue was challenged, and copyright/fair use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > laws concerning > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cross posting and > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
