Even classical mythology needs spotting  and equally with modern versions.

I am convinced that with in every generation there are prophets and false
prophets.. Teachers and false teachers; . . . the unfortunate part is it is
the false prophets and false teachers that draw the most crowds.
Allan



On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Errol <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree that classical mythology does not need spotting but modern day
> mythology does at least have the potential for danger.
>
> Myths such as racial superiority caused Germany to invade the rest of
> europe.
>
> Today we have modern myths based on racial stereotypes, such as, The
> Irish drink and fight excessively, Blacks are more athletic, Whites
> naturally oppress blacks, Asians are better at maths.
>
> Even more dangerous are conspiracy theories with the potential to
> become modern myths, such as the Holocaust never happened, the world
> is run by an elite group (elliminati) who control every aspect of our
> lives (a bit like the god myth), global warming is a hoax initiated by
> leftist socialists who want to destroy the economy of the USA
>
> Surely these require "spotting"?
>
>
> On Jan 31, 1:48 pm, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Neil, I understand " need spotting " and yet do not, considering the
> > nature of myths.
> >
> > Let me first declare that myths are about humanity, human nature,
> > human emotions, human values and aspirations, human tragedies and
> > highs, human dilemmas, human fears and courage, human stupidities and
> > intelligence, human failings and triumphs.
> >
> > The historical veracity and factual actuality pertaining to
> > particulars in myths just does not matter. A myth is what it does, to
> > me, to children, to people who are hearing it for the first time, for
> > the nth time, quite in those human terms I have pointed out.
> >
> > I find it foolish when people go about looking for history in myths.
> > Scientists and educated minds who insist on establishing science and
> > technology inaccuracies in myths are in fact not educated enough. Dare
> > I say that I find them stupid, vacant in their upper storey !
> >
> > On Jan 31, 3:20 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > ...such as the fact that myths need spotting? ;-)
> >
> > > On Jan 30, 10:32 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Myths, of course, need spotting, as many reel them off as though
> fact.
> >
> > > > On 30 Jan, 16:28, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Speaking of lay people and experts, fiddler, you'll find that the
> > > > > contributors here are a surprising mixture of both - on almost any
> > > > > subject you care to mention. Which does, of course, mean that
> > > > > generalising, off-the-cuff posts are usually an occasion for expert
> > > > > peer-review ...
> >
> > > > > Francis
> >
> > > > > On 29 Jan., 22:32, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > sorry, that was more snarky than intended. I'm very pressured and
> > > > > > frustrated. My paper was written to be viewed by faculty,
> therefore I
> > > > > > wrote in simplified terms for lay people. It was SUPPOSED to be
> > > > > > written as if pending review into a journal. Which of course,
> needed a
> > > > > > complete rewrite to remove any ambiguous terms and concepts in
> order
> > > > > > to be read and judged by experts...
> >
> > > > > > On Jan 29, 12:10 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > I had to completely revise a paper on soil composition and
> sedimentary
> > > > > > > content, that's why I only jump on quickly. Sorry if this isn't
> > > > > > > anywhere near the top of my priority list.
> >
> > > > > > > On Jan 29, 8:50 am, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On 29 January 2010 16:36, Vamadevananda <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Allan spoke with a reference. The response needs to be
> likewise
> > > > > > > > > pertinent.
> >
> > > > > > > > Hey, get in the queue Vam! I'm still waiting for Fiddler to
> give references
> > > > > > > > on Venezuela. :)
> >
> > > > > > > > Ian- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to