It is clear that the members of NLCR were involved in getting children
prior to the earthquake…and back as far as November.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8490843.stm
And apparently they admitted not seeking approval to take the kids
from Haiti.
http://www.statesman.com/news/world/haiti-charges-10-americans-with-kidnapping-214831.html


On Feb 4, 3:10 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I was clarifying that their status is irrelevant to me without
> inferring aspersion on your part.  The actions they are accused of are
> accusations, allegations waiting for resolution by the Haitian
> government.  I'm sure much of the reporting is rife with hearsay so I
> wouldn't attach entrepreneurial labels nor attach relevance to the
> accommodations which the accused leased during their stay.  That is
> simply irresponsible judgment when innocence should prevail until
> proof of guilt has been established.  In my post I doubted the
> accusations but your presentation is establishing guilt by selective
> observation without presenting factual evidence, a slippery slope
> really. Neither of you have presented any links to back up your
> assertions.  If it were that easy they would be in prison already, its
> not cut and dry.  I always thought it was "innocent until proven
> guilty" not guilty because it looks or smells like it.
>
> On Feb 4, 3:56 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was clarifying which people, not casting aspersions on them for
> > being missionaries. The truly harmful missionaries left there decades
> > ago. Oz beat me to the terrible actions that they are accused of. This
> > is not simply a case of helping. They had an opportunity to grab kids
> > w/o paying the government fees, this could have increased their
> > potential profit margin and was apparently too good to pass up.
>
> >   >How many more non-oil atrocities can you
>
> > > name which we just sit around and  watch on the news?
>
> > Far too many my friend, and I will no doubt see many more. considering
> > that the majority of Christians and nearly all conservatives,
> > moderates, repubs, inds, are actively opposed to helping Haiti
> > already. This doesn't bode well for them. Add to that the fact that
> > obummer "promised" and I'm afraid that the Haitians struggle is only
> > just begun.
> > I stopped "just sitting" some time ago however, now i donate money and
> > volunteer time for logistics training aid workers and counselling
> > those that become over-whelmed. It isn't much, but it's what I can do
> > atm.
>
> > On Feb 4, 9:12 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I doubt very much they were kidnapping children especially considering
> > > the fact that they tried to off them at another orphanage for
> > > temporary safe keeping.  The actual evidence is in their favor and I
> > > might add that I view them as Americans who went to help out in the
> > > crisis, the fact that they are missionaries is irrelevant to me.
> > > There must have been an enormous amount of confusion taking place
> > > similar to that of 9/11 where people just tried to do the right thing
> > > without thinking about bureaucratic red tape or later suffering from
> > > lung disease for lending a hand.  Remember the whole political
> > > structure was a shambles and chaos ensued.  If anything the people
> > > were just stupid for thinking their acts of kindness/love or whatever
> > > would transcend the reality of the law.  I don't see the people as
> > > criminals, possibly morons but that's it.
> > > Aside from a monetary donation I'm, as usual, dispassionate towards
> > > the crisis, I could care less if the whole place sank into the ocean
> > > tomorrow.  If Orn is really on to something of which I have little
> > > doubt, it adds to the list of resource motivated altruism.  With Bush
> > > it was helping the poor Iraqi people under the grips of a tyrant while
> > > millions of people in Dafur drank their own blood as we watched them
> > > die, Somalia? Congo? Rwanda?.  Now it's the poor Haitians that Obama
> > > has promised not to abandon.  I'm with Orn,
> > > Avarice or Altruism?
>
> > > On Feb 4, 1:34 am, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > The missionaries that were kidnapping children?
>
> > > > On Feb 3, 11:30 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > While it has all the earmarks of a conspiracy theory I wouldn't doubt
> > > > > it highly possible.  Unfortunately the resource will only delay the
> > > > > worlds transition to alternative energies; the environment is at
> > > > > stake.
>
> > > > > Right now though I'm putting a hold on my quake donation until they
> > > > > release the missionaries.  They should thank their lucky stars to have
> > > > > the hands on help.
>
> > > > > On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > “…Behind the smoke, rubble and unending drama of human tragedy in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > hapless Caribbean country, a drama is in full play for control of 
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > geophysicists believe may be one of the world’s richest zones for
> > > > > > hydrocarbons-oil and gas outside the Middle East, possibly orders of
> > > > > > magnitude greater than that of nearby Venezuela…” 
> > > > > > -http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17287
>
> > > > > > Do read the entire article if you have time.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to