*laughing* Molly, my angel, could it be that the Mod-God role is growing over your head? Let the real God decide who the group as a whole is and how long it will live. Please respect the reasons I gave for not subscribing to the typical American definition of the mutual respect that you demand.
Peace for all. On 20 Feb., 17:02, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me, fiddler, that you directed your comments and opinions > to Pat's specific ideas as presented in his posts, and the ideas of > Islam as you understand them. This is no infringement of the > guidelines. Challenging members to further explain their ideas is > what we do here, and while you are free to express you emotions about > the ideas, you may find they have little impact. Where you do cross > the line is in taunting the admin, whether it is me or any other. > Whether you see consistency or not, it is there, and your last > paragraph reads like a child having a tantrum, trying to create > conflict and drama where there is none. This is the behavior that may > eventually get you banned, because the group as a whole will not live > with it for long. > > On Feb 19, 4:52 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Your argument, here and elsewhere, is entirely specious and is nothing > > more than drivel. You say that a tool-maker who creates a jimmy-stick > > (car door lock disabler) allows the jimmy stick to be anything that it > > chooses, and yet will punish the tool if it is used in the fashion to > > which it was designed simply because the jimmy stick has no idea that > > it was designed to do so. This argument fails on so many different > > levels that I have difficulty knowing where to start. > > > The best way to describe my feelings of disgust for this idea is to > > use a vehicle for a concept, especially considering that we ourselves > > are only self motorised vehicles. According to you and your ilk, we > > are all vehicles for some use or whatnot. A creator, creating the > > vehicle to be all-terrain or to be fuel efficient, then condemns the > > vehicle if it performs adequately in the fashion that it was designed > > to operate. The vehicle need not be aware of the limitation to violate > > such limitation, and therefore is condemned. Your circular logic is > > not only damaging to a single persons psyche, it is damaging to > > humanity as a whole. > > > A maker of some sort being inclined to damn a person for doing that > > which they were intended is perfectly and exactly equivalent to a > > disturbed child crushing an insect piece by piece for the crime of not > > flying... after the child rips its wings off. This argument that is > > presented (i.e. that we have free will although we are created for a > > purpose) is disgusting and wrong. > > > Immediately after islams inception, people began formalising lists of > > silly arguments that are used to justify the existence of sad, > > destructive, and dangerous arguments. You might try looking at these > > fallacies in order not to repeat them quite so often. > > > Yes molly, I know. I called out someone that you "just love." Live > > with it or ban me, I'm tired of feeling uncomfortable knowing exactly > > what I might say that will offend your tender sensibilities. Or maybe > > just be consistent and warn them as well when they do the same. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
