I'm cool. Don't need to know, just see you pushing the limits now, and remind you again...have done my job...appears we are both cool. Very good.
On Feb 20, 12:30 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > But you don't know the facts, Molly. Please cool down. > > On 20 Feb., 17:52, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Piling on is your MO with the mods, gabby. I demand nothing of you > > but to respect the guidelines of the group. beyond that, your life is > > your own, and our picture of that is formed as you express yourself in > > here. You have been banned once. You know the drill. > > > On Feb 20, 11:46 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > *laughing* Molly, my angel, could it be that the Mod-God role is > > > growing over your head? Let the real God decide who the group as a > > > whole is and how long it will live. Please respect the reasons I gave > > > for not subscribing to the typical American definition of the mutual > > > respect that you demand. > > > > Peace for all. > > > > On 20 Feb., 17:02, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It seems to me, fiddler, that you directed your comments and opinions > > > > to Pat's specific ideas as presented in his posts, and the ideas of > > > > Islam as you understand them. This is no infringement of the > > > > guidelines. Challenging members to further explain their ideas is > > > > what we do here, and while you are free to express you emotions about > > > > the ideas, you may find they have little impact. Where you do cross > > > > the line is in taunting the admin, whether it is me or any other. > > > > Whether you see consistency or not, it is there, and your last > > > > paragraph reads like a child having a tantrum, trying to create > > > > conflict and drama where there is none. This is the behavior that may > > > > eventually get you banned, because the group as a whole will not live > > > > with it for long. > > > > > On Feb 19, 4:52 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Your argument, here and elsewhere, is entirely specious and is nothing > > > > > more than drivel. You say that a tool-maker who creates a jimmy-stick > > > > > (car door lock disabler) allows the jimmy stick to be anything that it > > > > > chooses, and yet will punish the tool if it is used in the fashion to > > > > > which it was designed simply because the jimmy stick has no idea that > > > > > it was designed to do so. This argument fails on so many different > > > > > levels that I have difficulty knowing where to start. > > > > > > The best way to describe my feelings of disgust for this idea is to > > > > > use a vehicle for a concept, especially considering that we ourselves > > > > > are only self motorised vehicles. According to you and your ilk, we > > > > > are all vehicles for some use or whatnot. A creator, creating the > > > > > vehicle to be all-terrain or to be fuel efficient, then condemns the > > > > > vehicle if it performs adequately in the fashion that it was designed > > > > > to operate. The vehicle need not be aware of the limitation to violate > > > > > such limitation, and therefore is condemned. Your circular logic is > > > > > not only damaging to a single persons psyche, it is damaging to > > > > > humanity as a whole. > > > > > > A maker of some sort being inclined to damn a person for doing that > > > > > which they were intended is perfectly and exactly equivalent to a > > > > > disturbed child crushing an insect piece by piece for the crime of not > > > > > flying... after the child rips its wings off. This argument that is > > > > > presented (i.e. that we have free will although we are created for a > > > > > purpose) is disgusting and wrong. > > > > > > Immediately after islams inception, people began formalising lists of > > > > > silly arguments that are used to justify the existence of sad, > > > > > destructive, and dangerous arguments. You might try looking at these > > > > > fallacies in order not to repeat them quite so often. > > > > > > Yes molly, I know. I called out someone that you "just love." Live > > > > > with it or ban me, I'm tired of feeling uncomfortable knowing exactly > > > > > what I might say that will offend your tender sensibilities. Or maybe > > > > > just be consistent and warn them as well when they do the same. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
