Is Gravity crashed or is it banned by Lord Google ? Hello ... anybody ...
On Mar 19, 3:10 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, just the other way round! Far too often I am cold, that's why I > love the sun. And I value rules more than wanting to teach how to > break them. Plus my head circumference is too large for my height. > > On Mar 19, 9:46 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Gabby, dear, ME already has a lot more than Gravity, in terms of > > culture and interpersonal relatedness. Gravity might too, but in > > future, if it would. > > > As of now, Gravity is an unknown club I've just joined. ME is already > > known, with an established focus on discussions proper. > > > Just saw the picture of yours more closely. Are you really as > > beautiful, playful and warm ? Your barbs on ME would leave such a > > contrary image ! Donna used to compensate somewhat. > > > On Mar 19, 3:00 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the immiscible !" > > > > I am sure you are right but don't understand why. My listening > > > comprehension ain't that developped yet. I see that using ME in > > > Gravity is allowed to be discussed over there. Which part am I > > > missing? > > > > On 18 Mrz., 14:06, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There's are a couple of impolite but exact words for what I understand > > > > of your post, Gabby. It's : bitching, a poke. > > > > > I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the immiscible ! > > > > > My last post was to state that emotions are not optional. And that, > > > > there a continuity including our self, values, ideas through emotion, > > > > to action. Rational things may then be spread, let recognition happen. > > > > One must want before having something to say, whether in agreement or > > > > not. That makes a group. > > > > > Technically, the social networking platforms have much infrastructure. > > > > But not a fraction of the relatedness I've found on ME. > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:19 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Wow, Vam, you surprise me! I would have thought you were the first to > > > > > embrace the renewed "ALL ' accepted ' members" policy over at Gravity! > > > > > Transformation up to a level of pure conciseness! > > > > > > On Mar 17, 9:29 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > These days, ME seems to be without protagonists, the likes of which > > > > > > created and participated in such lively threads, many of which I > > > > > > myself partook in from around Sept 2007. I have always valued it, > > > > > > thanks to KC and all those brilliant people who'd congregate. Often, > > > > > > it would keep me sane, cause to cheer me up, and leave me wondrous. > > > > > > > I know quite a few from the era outgrew the platform and have since > > > > > > moved on to other things. There's never a day, however, when I have > > > > > > not been to it, at least once, in the hope of reading something > > > > > > amazingly honest, authentic, true, logical, poetic, beautiful, well > > > > > > crafted, doubting, inclusive, new, or some such criterion that is > > > > > > largely belied in our everyday experience with people, their > > > > > > concerns, > > > > > > thoughts and preoccupations. > > > > > > > There definitely was a sense of oneness, characterised by this > > > > > > respect > > > > > > we had for ALL ' accepted ' members, despite very sharp and > > > > > > irreconcilable differences among them. The hunger and drive to > > > > > > articulate our position and our responses did the rest. > > > > > > > Speaking of creativity, the standard was well nigh high and I often > > > > > > felt spoilt for the choices there, like so many doorways to > > > > > > substance > > > > > > and delight ! > > > > > > > All said and done, I could always walk along in friendship, hand in > > > > > > hand with others, theists and atheists and all in between, dualists > > > > > > and non - dualists and everyone else ! > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 6:06 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4 Mar, 17:19, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Pat ! Between you and me, let oneness alone reign. We > > > > > > > > both owe > > > > > > > > to IT. > > > > > > > > {chuckle} Oneness could only reign alone and it's not within my > > > > > > > power > > > > > > > (or any of the 'seeming many') to add or detract from that > > > > > > > oneness. > > > > > > > But, I DO get what you mean, ;-) Not only do we owe to it, > > > > > > > there is > > > > > > > no other to which we could owe, for there is no other, much less, > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > there no other like that One. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:25 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb, 22:53, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is important to me, saying good bye to people who I > > > > > > > > > > was looking > > > > > > > > > > for but who I did not know existed before I'd met them on > > > > > > > > > > this forum. > > > > > > > > > > They'll remain with me, trans space and time and > > > > > > > > > > communication. > > > > > > > > > > > It's been a pleasure, all the way, not only with those who > > > > > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > supposedly partial to but also with those who I am > > > > > > > > > > allegedly partial > > > > > > > > > > against. Much like what I said to a friend this weekend, > > > > > > > > > > who seemed > > > > > > > > > > astonished at the way I conducted him on the highway to > > > > > > > > > > Rohtak : I > > > > > > > > > > may be perceived as being overcautious or a shade > > > > > > > > > > ambitious, even > > > > > > > > > > rash ... but all that was happening was that I was being > > > > > > > > > > comfortable > > > > > > > > > > with myself, being equally true to my weaknesses and my > > > > > > > > > > faults as to > > > > > > > > > > my strengths and my forte. > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, the herbs ( what kind of a word is ' weeds,' in > > > > > > > > > > comparison, in > > > > > > > > > > reference to the same thing ! ) and soma included ... I > > > > > > > > > > can choose to > > > > > > > > > > be demolishingly competitive on the road, when I want to > > > > > > > > > > put someone > > > > > > > > > > in his place, or disarmingly on a forum for the civilised > > > > > > > > > > if I am > > > > > > > > > > seeking a friend. > > > > > > > > > > > The truth is : I've just been a kid all the time because I > > > > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > > blissful and blessed all the time, below the adult or parent > > > > > > > > > > projections I deliberately form to cover it up with, > > > > > > > > > > because I find > > > > > > > > > > the others are not as blissful enough ! > > > > > > > > > > > I have not made much headway with the social networking > > > > > > > > > > sites. But > > > > > > > > > > Buzz seems easy. And I'll be taking on much of my posts > > > > > > > > > > here onto a > > > > > > > > > > blog on Wordpress.com, hopefully linked to a page in a > > > > > > > > > > website I shall > > > > > > > > > > commission shortly. > > > > > > > > > > > I'll sneak in from time to time ... it's irresistible, you > > > > > > > > > > know ... > > > > > > > > > > and it will never be that a personal mail shall remain > > > > > > > > > > without a > > > > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > I owe you a lot, Vam. I've no doubt that, without your > > > > > > > > > help, I > > > > > > > > > wouldn't be where I am today. All the best in all you do!! > > > > > > > > > You can't > > > > > > > > > really go all that far, these days, anyway. Especially if > > > > > > > > > you're > > > > > > > > > pointing us to where you can be found. May Brahman choose > > > > > > > > > wisely for > > > > > > > > > you! > > > > > > > > > > Kindest Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Pat- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
