Argh, Patty, but that's 3 times 3 in its dualistic appearance.

On 5 Mai, 18:24, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4 May, 07:06, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am sure there would be but I am not aware except for 3, the
> > trinity ... could you enlighten ?
>
> 99 Attributes/Names of Allah
>
> > On May 4, 1:24 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > One can find numbers and nouns in western learning structures, too,
> > > Vam!
>
> > > On 3 Mai, 21:47, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I do know why the number is important in eastern religions. There are
> > > > chants that are nothing but 108 names of the same supreme ...
>
> > > > On May 3, 9:39 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Not necessarily. The multiple gods could act like adjectives to a
> > > > > noun.
>
> > > > > On 3 Mai, 16:14, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The "gods " would then just be super-beings who will be born with 
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > universe and die with it , e.i. dualistic in nature.
>
> > > > > > On May 3, 5:42 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  Ifpure consciousness  transcends human awareness then as Kant 
> > > > > > > saysthe assertion of unity is only a hypothesis believed as an 
> > > > > > > article offaith. What if the pre Greeks are righter about the 
> > > > > > > nature of realitywith their notion of multiple "gods" a 
> > > > > > > multiplicity of realities?
>
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: RP <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 8:05 am
> > > > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: God and I
>
> > > > > > > Pure Consciousness, God, Atma , or the Self is non-dual and above
> > > > > > > awareness. Awareness implies dualism as it is not possible 
> > > > > > > otherwise.
> > > > > > > The entire creation which is dualistic in nature springs from the 
> > > > > > > non-
> > > > > > > dual and is like a hen coming out of an egg. i.e. all 
> > > > > > > predetermined. I
> > > > > > > know that I have no company in this view , yet I have expressed 
> > > > > > > it as
> > > > > > > basically I am truthful in nature.
>
> > > > > > > On May 2, 8:14 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > “OM , most people don't want to die…” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > While I don’t know ‘most people’ nor their wants and desires, 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > human organism as well as psyche does have a drive for life.
>
> > > > > > > > “… or have so many desires like psychic powers …” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > Again, I have no experience with ‘most people’ so do not know 
> > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > they want. As to psychic powers, it is true that I’ve heard 
> > > > > > > > precious
> > > > > > > > little from most of the people that I do know about psychic 
> > > > > > > > powers.
> > > > > > > > However, I cannot say the same about them having desires. It 
> > > > > > > > appears
> > > > > > > > that most people I know have quite a set of passions and 
> > > > > > > > desires. . .
> > > > > > > > attachments to all sorts of issues, things, attributes, hungers 
> > > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > > I make no value judgment about such things other than that 
> > > > > > > > which I
> > > > > > > > know…such thirsts do attract suffering.
>
> > > > > > > > “…that they make so much of consciousness.” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > And, my closer friends do have a focus on consciousness while my
> > > > > > > > acquaintances do not share much about consciousness itself.
>
> > > > > > > > “… In my view there is only God, Atma Or Pure Consciousness. We 
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > all just his
> > > > > > > > reflections or have emanated from him…” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > When observing things ultimate, I’d say we are of like minds 
> > > > > > > > here RP…
> > > > > > > > at the very least, have similar points of view.
>
> > > > > > > > “… Maybe my reasoning is awry and you and others are right…” – 
> > > > > > > > RP
>
> > > > > > > > If you are associating this response with my last post, I see no
> > > > > > > > contradiction. Perhaps there was a misunderstanding. The 
> > > > > > > > ‘reasoning’ I
> > > > > > > > criticized had to do with how I interpreted your words
>
> > > > > > > > “..It would be simply a state of coma.Go and ask for general
> > > > > > > > anaesthesia for a few minutes, that would be your self-
> > > > > > > > realisation. ..” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > Now, perhaps here it is I who don’t quite interpret your meaning
> > > > > > > > correctly. Only you will be the judge of that. Your above 
> > > > > > > > words, to
> > > > > > > > me, imply no awareness when self-realized…only “a state of 
> > > > > > > > coma”. From
> > > > > > > > what little experience I have here and what I have read from 
> > > > > > > > those who
> > > > > > > > have taken this path over the millennia, while we are living and
> > > > > > > > associated with a specific body (not dead), even though specific
> > > > > > > > states of consciousness can come and go where one is not 
> > > > > > > > attached to
> > > > > > > > ‘self’ nor appearances, there must be and is a consubstantial
> > > > > > > > recognition of both the absolute (no words/concepts) as well as 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > “I”…that which thinks, has emotions etc.
>
> > > > > > > > “… But in that case also I am right, You will become one with 
> > > > > > > > God when
> > > > > > > > you get salvation and then there will be no individual I , as 
> > > > > > > > far as
> > > > > > > > you will be concerned. If I am not mistaken , you at least 
> > > > > > > > believe in
> > > > > > > > predeterminism , like me.” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > Many issues in this small set of words RP…first, I’m not so 
> > > > > > > > sure that
> > > > > > > > the issue of being ‘right’ is that important to me here. I 
> > > > > > > > wanted to
> > > > > > > > discuss and share with you. We may not agree and this is fine. 
> > > > > > > > We in
> > > > > > > > fact may be fully agreeing and don’t know it due to the use of
> > > > > > > > subjective words and terms. There are many possibilities here. 
> > > > > > > > As to
> > > > > > > > one becoming ‘one with god’…I find that to be the case for 
> > > > > > > > everyone …
> > > > > > > > primarily demonstrated by divine omnipresence. Now, the term of
> > > > > > > > salvation doesn’t seem to enter into the discussion for me…at 
> > > > > > > > least
> > > > > > > > not when it comes to terminology. Perhaps you can elucidate 
> > > > > > > > here. As
> > > > > > > > to an ‘individual I’, we are in agreement in one sense at 
> > > > > > > > least. I
> > > > > > > > find that the common notion of ‘I’, ego etc., in any ultimate 
> > > > > > > > sense is
> > > > > > > > not real. However, since I and apparently most other human 
> > > > > > > > beings do
> > > > > > > > notice and recognize a ‘self’, whether it is mere appearances 
> > > > > > > > or not,
> > > > > > > > to ignore ‘I’ doesn’t seem to be the proper path to take. 
> > > > > > > > Lastly, as
> > > > > > > > to predeterminism, in one sense, yes, we share a similar view 
> > > > > > > > if not
> > > > > > > > the same. That is such a large topic that I won’t delve into it 
> > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > this time though.
>
> > > > > > > > On May 1, 8:22 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > OM , most people don't want to die or have so many desires 
> > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > psychic powers that they make so much of consciousness. In my 
> > > > > > > > > view
> > > > > > > > > there is only God, Atma Or Pure Consciousness. We are all 
> > > > > > > > > just his
> > > > > > > > > reflections or have emanated from him. Maybe my reasoning is 
> > > > > > > > > awry and
> > > > > > > > > you and others are right. But in that case also I am right, 
> > > > > > > > > You will
> > > > > > > > > become one with God when you get salvation and then there 
> > > > > > > > > will be no
> > > > > > > > > individual I , as far as you will be concerned. If I am not 
> > > > > > > > > mistaken ,
> > > > > > > > > you at least believe in predeterminism , like me.
> > > > > > > > > On May 1, 4:57 pm, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > “…There would be no I as that also requires
> > > > > > > > > > some  sort of sense. There would be no thought as it would 
> > > > > > > > > > require a
> > > > > > > > > > memory of words or sound. It would be simply a state of 
> > > > > > > > > > coma…” – RP
>
> > > > > > > > > > RP, thanks for responding to what I believe was my post.
>
> > > > > > > > > > With that assumption, the above part of your notes makes 
> > > > > > > > > > some very
> > > > > > > > > > large assumptions that do not appear to be the case. Yes, I 
> > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > understand how they make a kind of ‘sense’ on first glance; 
> > > > > > > > > > however,
> > > > > > > > > > somehow you appear to assume that all of 
> > > > > > > > > > consciousness/awareness
> > > > > > > > > > involves thought and/or sense perception. I and others do 
> > > > > > > > > > not find
> > > > > > > > > > this to be the case.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On May 1, 8:45 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Just contemplate for a moment what comprises 
> > > > > > > > > > > consciousness. You are
> > > > > > > > > > > conscious of sight, sound, scent, taste , your body 
> > > > > > > > > > > through sense of
> > > > > > > > > > > feeling. In your mind you are aware of these very things 
> > > > > > > > > > > through your
> > > > > > > > > > > memory of them. If your memory and the centres of these 
> > > > > > > > > > > senses cease
> > > > > > > > > > > to work for some time what would be there in your 
> > > > > > > > > > > awareness.
> > > > > > > > > > > Consciousness then  would be aware of itself. There would 
> > > > > > > > > > > be no shape
> > > > > > > > > > > or a feeling of some object. There would be no I as that 
> > > > > > > > > > > also requires
> > > > > > > > > > > some  sort of sense. There would be no thought as it 
> > > > > > > > > > > would require a
> > > > > > > > > > > memory of words or sound. It would be simply a state of 
> > > > > > > > > > > coma.Go and
> > > > > > > > > > > ask for general anaesthesia for a few minutes, that would 
> > > > > > > > > > > be your self-
> > > > > > > > > > > realisation.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 10:29 am, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Consciousness
>
> > ...
>
> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to