On 12 May, 11:26, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well Arch, it seems, according to Pat, that slippage in the libidinous
> economy is the reason space time gave us Viagra.
>

{snickers}  Well, Viagra DOES cause some parts of space-time to expand
more than they otherwise would and that, in turn, DOES allow for more
libidinous uses OF those parts. All by design...of course.

> On May 11, 5:57 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have to admit Pat, that most of my mistakes seem to have been
> > learning experiences designed to ensure I go on making better and
> > better mistakes.  I have, of course, no problems with Slip's
> > libidinous memories, but with slippage to the libidinal economy.  I
> > have a feeling there is no future if all events in the past must
> > remain as they were.
>
> > On 11 May, 12:24, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 11 May, 01:05, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Ahh, yes Archy, the memories.  I relive the games often.  It is
> > > > actually a very distinct aspect of human exchange very rarely looked
> > > > at for what it really is; perhaps one of the most pleasurable rue
> > > > forms of the libidinous nature with mutual high hopes for deep
> > > > penetrations.  I can't think of anything more enjoyable than engaging
> > > > in seductive parlays with a voluptuous member of the opposite sex.
> > > > Of course they say marriage is grand but divorce is fifty grand and up
> > > > so getting past the pleasure without getting tied up in knots can
> > > > become the challenge.  But I have to say there were those that I
> > > > foolishly let go and in retrospect and reminiscence I ponder the
> > > > possibilities, ergo; my  most famous words "If Only".
>
> > > No need for regrets, my friend.  Space-time doesn't do anything
> > > unnecessary, because ALL of it is already extant.  Including those
> > > regrets.  So, whilst that may seem paradoxical (in that I say there's
> > > no need for regrets, yet also explain that your regrets WERE
> > > necessary), what I mean is that there is no need for FUTURE regrets,
> > > now that you know that all events in the past HAD to be the way they
> > > were in order to get the universe to where it is now.  That is,
> > > there's little sense in regretting what was necessary.
>
> > > > On May 10, 6:29 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Slip has reminded me of the word 'foreploy' and the world of former
> > > > > rusing.
>
> > > > > On 10 May, 14:07, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 7 May, 18:39, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > No, I am not two-faced and my tongue is not split. Please don't 
> > > > > > > burn
> > > > > > > me.
>
> > > > > > Oh no, I wasn't trying to imply that you were two-faced.  Rather, I
> > > > > > was trying to perform a 'vorterspiele' on your "Also Sprach..."  and
> > > > > > relating you to Zarathustra, who was the prophet of a dualistic
> > > > > > faith.  It was only a pun, NEVER meant as any kind of punishment.
> > > > > > Apologies, if I offended you.  Really!!
>
> > > > > > > On 7 Mai, 14:14, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On 7 May, 11:09, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Thank you, my best Lee, you've made my day!
>
> > > > > > > > > I know the London of the 80's a little bit, a time when I was 
> > > > > > > > > stopped
> > > > > > > > > in the street by a police officer for walking with a black 
> > > > > > > > > man - I
> > > > > > > > > should go find find some better company. Policemen in Berlin 
> > > > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > have never dared to act like that, the black man could have 
> > > > > > > > > been an
> > > > > > > > > American soldier.
>
> > > > > > > > > Anyway, "God is all so Bastard" is gorgeous! You see, I have 
> > > > > > > > > a bad
> > > > > > > > > habit of starting my explanations in German with "also", 
> > > > > > > > > which means
> > > > > > > > > "thus" in this case. You know, the Thus-spoke-Gabby-style, 
> > > > > > > > > always
> > > > > > > > > wonderfully demonstrated by our friend orny. But I've been 
> > > > > > > > > working on
> > > > > > > > > it, I hope you've noticed!
>
> > > > > > > > Is this a way of affirming/asserting yourself as a 
> > > > > > > > reincarnation of
> > > > > > > > Zarathustra?  ;-)  How about "Die 
> > > > > > > > Verstecktsachenzweisprecherin" as a
> > > > > > > > title of respect?
>
> > > > > > > > For those who don't speak German to any length, I'd translate 
> > > > > > > > that as
> > > > > > > > "The woman who secretly speaks two things" (in reference to
> > > > > > > > Zarathustra (Zoroaster), the prophet of a dualistic faith,
> > > > > > > > Zoroastrianism) although, literally, I've just shoved the words 
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > 'hidden', 'things', 'two' and 'speaker' together with a feminine
> > > > > > > > ending and preceded by a feminine definite article.  But German 
> > > > > > > > excels
> > > > > > > > at inventing new words by adding other words together; truly, 
> > > > > > > > it's one
> > > > > > > > of its greatest powers, in my opinion, and one that English 
> > > > > > > > inherited,
> > > > > > > > albeit in a, funnily enough, bastardised way.  ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > > On 7 Mai, 10:30, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Hahah!  I disagree my dearest Gabs, God is all so Bastard, 
> > > > > > > > > > yep we can
> > > > > > > > > > certianly call God that, I don't really know why a person 
> > > > > > > > > > of faith
> > > > > > > > > > would want to but, ahh if they wish to, well go right ahead.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On 6 May, 22:21, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > "Bastards" is definitely not one of the 99 names of 
> > > > > > > > > > > Allah, Pat.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Mai, 14:02, Pat <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 May, 12:49, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh Gabbs, I'm afraid I can't answer that.  Shhh 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it's my secret to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > keep.  I will say though not Tory, ohhh no never that.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's also a pretty safe bet you didn't vote BNP.  
> > > > > > > > > > > > Personally, I'd
> > > > > > > > > > > > reckon you voted Lib Dem. hoping for a hung parliament 
> > > > > > > > > > > > and the chance
> > > > > > > > > > > > that it might just bring, God help us, coalition 
> > > > > > > > > > > > between factions
> > > > > > > > > > > > forcing the bastards to work together rather than 
> > > > > > > > > > > > against one another.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 May, 11:47, gabbydott <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I'm in for the guessing game, although I'm 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > terrible at it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should be voting Labour for traditional 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasons, but for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > betterment of your children Tory would be more 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasonable, yet the old
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > freedom fighter in you calls for the Libs. Help me, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > which duty has
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > won?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Mai, 10:31, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless of course the word of the day is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Sarcasam'.  I have been
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reliably informed though that Americans do not 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get it!  More racism,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to jolly up a drab Thursday morning.  Ohh 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by-the-by, I'm happy to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > report that my civic duty has been done again for 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the next 4 years.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 May, 08:23, gabbydott <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who started this educational thread, OM?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You could note for your lesson learned that 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your pupils are too
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ignorant to get your fine humor.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 8:27 am, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Race baiting again?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 5, 9:43 pm, Slip Disc 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this your insidious attempt at insulting 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a very important Mexican
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > celebration?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think your post is nothing more than 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > racist commentary based on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ignorance of the actual celebration of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > independence, "Cinco De Mayo"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which anyone with a smidgen of a brain 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knows is the recognition of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mexican independence from France achieved 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at the battle of Puebla
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which took place in 1862 during the month 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of May and on the 5th day of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the month.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You purport yourself as the enlightened one 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then proffer garbage
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such as this.  How low are you willing to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > go Senior Ornamentalmind?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only a sick puppy would post such racism.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have something against Mexicans senior?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 5, 11:03 am, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most people don’t know that back in 1912, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hellmann’s mayonnaise was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manufactured in England. In fact the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Titanic was carrying 12,000 jars
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the condiment scheduled for delivery 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in Vera Cruz, Mexico, which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was to be the net port of call for the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great ship after its stop in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > New York.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would have been the largest single 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shipment of mayonnaise ever
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > delivered to Mexico. But, as we know, the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great ship did not make it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to New York. The ship hit an iceberg and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sank, the cargo was forever
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lost.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The people of Mexico, who were crazy 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about mayonnaise, and were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eagerly awaiting its delivery were 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > disconsolate at the loss. Their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anguish was so great, that they declared 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a National Day of Mourning,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which they still observe to this day.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The National Day of Mourning occurs each 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year on
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to