Pat , are you sure that your book will start the paradigm shift? Are you sure that the shift has already started as your proposed book is under discussion in this forum? Is it possible that you are suffering from delusions of grandeur or maybe paranoid ideation?
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 18 May, 18:18, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pat is mistaking himself for God, but he's not the only one here, > > which makes them bearable. > > > > I'll ignore that. I lay NO claims to such and have never made such > claims. I'll ask God to forgive your error. But, please, don't lay > that claim at my feet, again. It's a bold-faced lie. > > > On 18 Mai, 16:16, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I must be missing something here FF... Who's the determinist conmen > > > that "we" are mistaking? I also have no feeling that God's > > > understanding is anything less than infinite. The illusion that the so > > > called "haves" have created, has been a veil of perception. I think I > > > can agree on that point provided I am understanding you correctly. > > > Would you care to continue in your discourse and elaborate? > > > > > On May 16, 10:18 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Pat, > > > > God's understanding is infinite. There's no doubt about that. > > > > When we mistake some determinist conmen for omnipotent entity, we get > > > > the feeling that God's understanding is not infinite. This ignorance > > > > gives rise to illusion which, in turn, prompts us to assume that > > > > opinion of "haves" represents the entire cosmic awareness... > > > > > > On May 7, 8:09 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 7 May, 15:53, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > God is the mind which concieves the universe , He is the mind > which > > > > > > runs it, and He is the mind which destroys it. He does not see in > the > > > > > > manner in which we see each other and He does not act in the > manner in > > > > > > which we act. His awareness and action is transcendental in > nature. In > > > > > > our vanity we may pretend to comprehend Him, but we do not see or > > > > > > accept the fact that our intelligence is not infinite but only a > few > > > > > > grades above that of animals. We have to just look at animals to > > > > > > realise that , after all our understanding also is finite. We are > > > > > > learning and growing day by day , but we are far from being > Supreme. > > > > > > > Well, He does see as we do, but He also sees in a way we do not. > When > > > > > you look at something, in reality, it is Him that is seeing (and > > > > > hearing and every other sensation any of us sense). And His > ability > > > > > to multiprocess all our awarenesses (and the awareness of all > living > > > > > things!) is a part of what defines His transcendant abilities. But > > > > > there are more (unseen) places than just this 4-D universe and His > > > > > wareness includes all that, as well. You're also right about our > > > > > level of consciousness being not that much above other animals. It > is > > > > > our conceit that leads us to believe we are far greater than they > > > > > are. But we're not. God can think like a tree (and, in fact > thinks > > > > > like each tree, as each tree's awareness is, in fact, His), yet no > > > > > animal can. I'm not sure that God's understanding is infinite, but > it > > > > > is comprehensive, that is, it covers everything, though there may > be a > > > > > limit, that limit is far beyond our comprehension.- Hide quoted > text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - >
