It seems the way I came across to this Group, the ideas and views I presented, have affected some people. Pat may be true in saying that he'd been thus ' helped.' I do remember communicating with a few others through mail.
But my query is : so what ? ... not to dismiss, but to remind ourselves of the duty to go back to our de - anchored view or perception, or continue with the search, even as we live it out in the world, live out the mind and the concept structures that constitute us ... with the desire to know, reflect and awaken into greater peace, from where more loving, effective and fulfilling, and regenerative actions proceed. I have no doubt that all well - meaning people are doing the same, in their own ways, to consequences appropriate to their own preoccupying natures and exigencies, that mean and form us in the middle of things. Most are vivacious, cooling off their minds from time to time than knowing it. But they are preferable than those who do not rise and merely become adept, great adepts but chilling like lords Voldemort, dedicated to a specific concept - structure that is deified but only because it assures one's own overriding self - importance. Few indeed see the measure of our acceptance of diversity, and of the plurality about us, as a definite KPI of love, peace and wisdom in our lives. Because for it to be, much of our earned spiritual power, happiness and freedom, need to be subsumed in the practice of ' not this,' ' not this.' The destination is without all concept structures, of oneself and of the other(s).
