"Far too many variable like
  that make the 'truth' impossible to discover, as the details of
  reality are just too complicated."

I think that the 'truth' is easy to discover when we look into
ourselves provided we are willing to accept it. The convaluted truth
around us is only a reflection of ourselves in denial of our inner
truth.

On Jun 4, 7:58 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3 June, 18:07, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder if it's possible to test your theory on dark matter using a
> > tuned laser and mirrors? Interesting thoughts in any case! I'm going
> > to mull this one over a bit.
>
> It seems like a reasonable test, as with the lasers, you'd know the
> exact frequency of the photons emitted across your line of sight and
> could, thus, calculate the 'expected' dark matter.  But, of course, in
> space, we have no idea of the number of stars emitting photons of
> varying frequencies (from radio waves to gamma rays) in 360 degrees X
> by 360 degrees Y by 360 degrees Z axes, so there'd be little hope of
> calculating a reasonable 'expected' value.  Far too many variable like
> that make the 'truth' impossible to discover, as the details of
> reality are just too complicated.
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 5:51 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 1 June, 11:03, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > really! awesome.. i totally had no idea of that..luno solar actitvity
> > > > influencing us so..'may' is a pretty strong word in itself though..
>
> > > Well, it's difficult to prove.  Although there's no doubt that gravity
> > > has far-reaching effects.  Technically, it reaches across the universe
> > > and every particle of matter that HAS mass has some gravitational
> > > effects on every other particle.  Also note that, while photons have
> > > no 'rest mass', one NEVER sees a photon at rest.  Rather, they move at
> > > near the speed of light (I say 'near' in order to account for some
> > > slowing that occurs as they move through whatever medium they are
> > > moving through, whether that be our atmosphere or the lens of a
> > > telescope and ultimately the cornea and lens of our eye).  So, while I
> > > expect you are familiar with E=MC^2 as the relationship between energy
> > > and mass, there is another equation that must also come into play with
> > > respect to photons and that is E=Fh where E is energy, F is the
> > > frequency of the photon and 'h' is the Planck Constant.  So, by using
> > > these two equations together, one can see that if you take the
> > > frequency of a photon, F, and multiply it by the Planck Constant, you
> > > yield the 'energy' of that photon.  Divide that by C^2, the speed of
> > > light in a vacuum, and you have calculated the 'mass' of the photon.
> > > It's my belief that the supposed 'dark matter' is nothing more than
> > > the gravitational trails of the countless photons moving across space-
> > > time.  The more space-time that one looks through, the more trails of
> > > photon have crossed that path and, thus, the more 'dark matter' you
> > > see.  Note, you only see the photons that are heading towards your
> > > eyes, those that cross across that path are NOT seen and it is THESE
> > > that I believe form the basis of the elusive dark matter that accounts
> > > for a huge amount of energy that simply passes across our line of
> > > sight.  Because we don't 'see' these photons (because they aren't
> > > headed in our direction), they only show up by virtue of their
> > > gravitational effects, thus they 'appear' as dark matter.
>
> > > > On 6/1/10, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 30 May, 08:45, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is there a fragment
> > > > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely irrational...does 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it legitimacy..or is it 
> > > > > > pure
> > > > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life...
>
> > > > > It could well be an aspect of the general holography of the universe.
> > > > > That is, there are aspects ofthe universe which reflect the entirety,
> > > > > if one is open to looking for these reflections and know how to
> > > > > interpret them.  One thing IS for sure, gravity's effect is real and
> > > > > carries across space-time from one end to the other.  We know that the
> > > > > luno-solar gravity accounts for the tides and the word 'lunacy'
> > > > > implies that those tidal effects may (strictly MAY!!) also affect our
> > > > > cerebro-spinal fluid in a subtle way.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to