On 4 June, 13:21, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > "Far too many variable like > that make the 'truth' impossible to discover, as the details of > reality are just too complicated." > > I think that the 'truth' is easy to discover when we look into > ourselves provided we are willing to accept it. The convaluted truth > around us is only a reflection of ourselves in denial of our inner > truth. >
I.e., the holographic universe. That is, all parts of the universe reflect all the other parts. If that is true, then there would be something behind astrology, as the planets would be reflecting the state of the univere in a subtle way. Not that they DICTATE events, but that they reflect them. So, a careful study of events and planetary positions could yield enough data to suggest, by planetary positions, what events might be likely. But only after a LOT of study of both events and astronomical observations. Which is why I'm still angry about what Marc Antony and Caliph Umar did to the Great Library of Alexandria (albeit 650-odd years apart!), which, supposedly, contained some 10,000 years worth of Chaldean astronomical/ astrological data. One (Antony) out of pride and the other (Umar) out of pure lack of respect. > On Jun 4, 7:58 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 3 June, 18:07, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I wonder if it's possible to test your theory on dark matter using a > > > tuned laser and mirrors? Interesting thoughts in any case! I'm going > > > to mull this one over a bit. > > > It seems like a reasonable test, as with the lasers, you'd know the > > exact frequency of the photons emitted across your line of sight and > > could, thus, calculate the 'expected' dark matter. But, of course, in > > space, we have no idea of the number of stars emitting photons of > > varying frequencies (from radio waves to gamma rays) in 360 degrees X > > by 360 degrees Y by 360 degrees Z axes, so there'd be little hope of > > calculating a reasonable 'expected' value. Far too many variable like > > that make the 'truth' impossible to discover, as the details of > > reality are just too complicated. > > > > On Jun 2, 5:51 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 1 June, 11:03, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > really! awesome.. i totally had no idea of that..luno solar actitvity > > > > > influencing us so..'may' is a pretty strong word in itself though.. > > > > > Well, it's difficult to prove. Although there's no doubt that gravity > > > > has far-reaching effects. Technically, it reaches across the universe > > > > and every particle of matter that HAS mass has some gravitational > > > > effects on every other particle. Also note that, while photons have > > > > no 'rest mass', one NEVER sees a photon at rest. Rather, they move at > > > > near the speed of light (I say 'near' in order to account for some > > > > slowing that occurs as they move through whatever medium they are > > > > moving through, whether that be our atmosphere or the lens of a > > > > telescope and ultimately the cornea and lens of our eye). So, while I > > > > expect you are familiar with E=MC^2 as the relationship between energy > > > > and mass, there is another equation that must also come into play with > > > > respect to photons and that is E=Fh where E is energy, F is the > > > > frequency of the photon and 'h' is the Planck Constant. So, by using > > > > these two equations together, one can see that if you take the > > > > frequency of a photon, F, and multiply it by the Planck Constant, you > > > > yield the 'energy' of that photon. Divide that by C^2, the speed of > > > > light in a vacuum, and you have calculated the 'mass' of the photon. > > > > It's my belief that the supposed 'dark matter' is nothing more than > > > > the gravitational trails of the countless photons moving across space- > > > > time. The more space-time that one looks through, the more trails of > > > > photon have crossed that path and, thus, the more 'dark matter' you > > > > see. Note, you only see the photons that are heading towards your > > > > eyes, those that cross across that path are NOT seen and it is THESE > > > > that I believe form the basis of the elusive dark matter that accounts > > > > for a huge amount of energy that simply passes across our line of > > > > sight. Because we don't 'see' these photons (because they aren't > > > > headed in our direction), they only show up by virtue of their > > > > gravitational effects, thus they 'appear' as dark matter. > > > > > > On 6/1/10, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 30 May, 08:45, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is there a > > > > > > > fragment > > > > > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely > > > > > > > irrational...does the > > > > > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it legitimacy..or is it > > > > > > > pure > > > > > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life... > > > > > > > It could well be an aspect of the general holography of the > > > > > > universe. > > > > > > That is, there are aspects ofthe universe which reflect the > > > > > > entirety, > > > > > > if one is open to looking for these reflections and know how to > > > > > > interpret them. One thing IS for sure, gravity's effect is real and > > > > > > carries across space-time from one end to the other. We know that > > > > > > the > > > > > > luno-solar gravity accounts for the tides and the word 'lunacy' > > > > > > implies that those tidal effects may (strictly MAY!!) also affect > > > > > > our > > > > > > cerebro-spinal fluid in a subtle way.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
