" uh... i was just hoping to get an explanation about its occurence thats all.. really "
My apologies, Kid, for having offered a suggestion rather powerfully, when you were not only not looking for one but were actually looking for something entirely different. " it all(everything) and no matter how little it may be now...in all its completeness and enormity... comes in a vertiginous sensation to me..and i kinda enjoy it " This is not decodable, Kid ! What is " all ( everything )" ? And, how is it " little " now ? What completeness and enormity ... comes in a vertiginous sensation ? On Jun 22, 1:20 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont know vam...it all(everything) and no matter how little it may be > now...in all its completeness and enormity... comes in a vertiginous > sensation to me..and i kinda enjoy it > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:25 AM, vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, Kid, are you meaning the mere idea or the real one ? Which > > parallel universe are you referring to ? There are trillions of them, > > you know ! > > > On the other hand, the one created for and by you, is the most > > important one ... isn't it ? What are you doing about that ... all > > those unknowns in it, subconscious in it, mental in it ... spewing > > dissatisfactions, incompletions, inadequacies, nothingnesses, doubts, > > fears, false but necessary dogmas, those horribly misplaced ideas and > > beliefs you have of yourself ... etc. ... continuing, from god knows > > when, to god knows when ... leaving you stranded really, wanting, > > unsure, preoccupied, dark ... ... > > > Sorry ... that was my way of suggesting that we all ought to get more > > real about ourselves, more knowing and clear in our actions, being > > less and less mental, with less and less subconscious, more happy and > > content, more self - empowered to infuse strength and cheer among > > those about us, more battle ready against that wrong thrust upon us, > > more free of want and dissatisfaction and fear ... well, that does > > perhaps seem like a trillion mile journey, but no worries, we only > > need to concern ourselves with just the one that needs to be taken > > now ! > > > We are the Work In Progress, or Regress. Yes, I am talking about us. > > What's more important than that ! > > > On Jun 22, 12:10 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So how does the idea of parallel uiverse figure in the already decided > > chain > > > of events? > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pat <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On 18 June, 13:09, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yes RP I agree. > > > > > > We do it seems have much choice, and we do indeed often have none. > > > > > > An accident, will change the choices that we have and so the choices > > > > > that we make. The future is not defined, > > > > > Einstein proved that incorrect 105 years ago. Proved! Since then, it > > > > has never been disproved, rather, only supported. There is truth, > > > > though, in your words...the word 'seems'. It seems that we have > > > > choices. That IS true. But it is an illusion. And I KNOW we don't > > > > want to go 'round and round' this again. Do we? LOL!! ;-) > > > > > >both human choice and > > > > > circumstances beyond our control for which we have no choices to > > make, > > > > > go a loong way in deciding what our futures will be. > > > > > > On 17 June, 21:07, hassan yacoub <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > no we are not bound by the future but the future is bound by our > > > > present and > > > > > > it is affected by what we do now and whatever we choice and it is > > too > > > > (the > > > > > > future )a result of the present and this future depends upon the > > effort > > > > we > > > > > > do we try and we may succeed or not we try to do our best and as > > much > > > > as we > > > > > > are strong in mind and in body and educated well by good knowledge > > we > > > > may > > > > > > succeed and our action be right even right in a place may be wrong > > some > > > > how > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Pat says that we are bound by the future and our choices are > > > > therefore > > > > > > > those which result in a particular future event. I beg to differ > > and > > > > > > > believe that our present actions are the result of our effort > > and > > > > > > > endeavour, but our effort is bound by our physical and > > psychological > > > > > > > motives in reaction to the present nature of the environment. > > That > > > > > > > what we do becomes definite doesn't change the nature of actions. > > We > > > > > > > try to change ourselves and act with a resolve to create a > > certain > > > > > > > future , and that future is an effect of our actions and not > > > > > > > viceversa. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > hi to all- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > \--/ Peace > > -- > \--/ Peace
