Donna was part of her user name in a previous avatar that I prefer
over gabs, which term I associate with ( loud ) mouth !

On Jun 22, 8:48 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why do you call gabby Donna??
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM, vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > You've judged prematurely, Donna !
>
> > Evolving ( in one's knowledge and understanding, and empowerment )
> > does NOT equate " correcting the meaning making process."
>
> > And yes, as suggested by you, I'm asking you :  What is the heart of
> > the matter ? And, what gets there ?
>
> > On Jun 22, 1:01 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Working on correcting the meaning making process doesn't get to the
> > > heart of the matter, if you would ask me, my dear friend. ;-)
>
> > > On 21 Jun., 23:54, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Okay ...  though my use of the word content has been misinterpreted by
> > > > you as meaning " content with wat we have ! " What I meant was
> > > > settled, as in knowing even when facing the unknown, confident even
> > > > when apprehensive or fearful, happy even while wanting, ... and so
> > > > on ...  which comes from knowing life and our self very intimately,
> > > > over long time scales, in that everything passes yielding knowledge to
> > > > the aware and fully alert intellect, leaving nothing for the
> > > > subconscious and ourself free, unencumbered, more empowered.
>
> > > > The fact is that, in common with other animals, we are Body - Food -
> > > > Sex - Emotion - Subconscious - Power seeking and Willful beings. No
> > > > amount of family, formal education, money, position, status, marriage,
> > > > age ...  and everything else ... is ever going to change that primary
> > > > fact. Engage all we might to satisfy ourselves, the hunger would
> > > > return in 5 minutes, hours or days, weeks, months or years. The
> > > > repetitive phenomena is so obvious, an entire economy is busy spicing
> > > > things up for us, our body, food and sex, with the money and power we
> > > > have, to meet our desires, willfulness, whims or caprices. This
> > > > Emotion - Subconsciousness - Will arrangement is natural, as in it is
> > > > provided in nature, largely reflexive or involuntary, situational or '
> > > > seasonal,' primarily to serve our survival and procreational ends.
>
> > > > But even this cyclic routine is accompanied with consequences, also
> > > > obvious to the alert self, which then begins to doubt, think and
> > > > question, through all the emotion filled experiences : happy, sad,
> > > > pleasant, miserable, found, lost. That's when we are identified with
> > > > the mind, in which the thinking processes take place, in which ideas
> > > > get formed, both of the objects we physically - emotionally need and
> > > > of our experiences, and hence of ourself.
>
> > > > This is as far as Duryodhana would evolve, when he confesses : O
> > > > Krishna, it's not that I do not know what is right or wrong, good and
> > > > bad. It's just that I cannot help myself to what is right, what is
> > > > good, and choose the wrong and the bad instead. He exemplifies the
> > > > Outside - In processes, in mental beings, as Molly so often reminds
> > > > us.
>
> > > > Arjuna's evolution takes another path : when Knowledge and
> > > > Understanding become the primary characterstic of our being ...
>
> > > > It's too late in the night, Kid ...  maybe some other time. Or, better
> > > > still, come over and spend a weekend participating in The Meaning
> > > > Workshop !
>
> > > > On Jun 22, 1:49 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > .. you said that we often spend our lives with fear and a feeling of
> > > > > nothingness and doubt.. and that we'd rather be self content with wat
> > we
> > > > > have... thats wat i was trying to tell you...this whole experience...
> > my
> > > > > experience(limited as it may be)..of the world .. being a part of
> > it...and
> > > > > of everything that constitutes it.. comes to me with a great
> > force...you
> > > > > know if i was just better at explaining things my proffesors would
> > grade me
> > > > > better;-)
>
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:11 AM, vamadevananda <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > " uh... i was just hoping to get an explanation about its occurence
> > > > > > thats all.. really "
>
> > > > > > My apologies, Kid, for having offered a suggestion rather
> > powerfully,
> > > > > > when you were not only not looking for one but were actually
> > looking
> > > > > > for something entirely different.
>
> > > > > > " it all(everything) and no matter how little it may be now...in
> > all
> > > > > > its completeness and enormity... comes in a vertiginous sensation
> > to
> > > > > > me..and i kinda enjoy it "
>
> > > > > > This is not decodable, Kid ! What is " all ( everything )" ?  And,
> > how
> > > > > > is it " little " now ?  What completeness and enormity ... comes in
> > a
> > > > > > vertiginous sensation ?
>
> > > > > > On Jun 22, 1:20 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > I dont know vam...it all(everything) and no matter how little it
> > may be
> > > > > > > now...in all its completeness and enormity... comes in a
> > vertiginous
> > > > > > > sensation to me..and i kinda enjoy it
>
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:25 AM, vamadevananda <
> > [email protected]
> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hey, Kid, are you meaning the mere idea or the real one ?
> >  Which
> > > > > > > > parallel universe are you referring to ?  There are trillions
> > of them,
> > > > > > > > you know !
>
> > > > > > > > On the other hand, the one created for and by you, is the most
> > > > > > > > important one ... isn't it ?  What are you doing about that ...
> > all
> > > > > > > > those unknowns in it, subconscious in it, mental in it ...
> > spewing
> > > > > > > > dissatisfactions, incompletions, inadequacies, nothingnesses,
> > doubts,
> > > > > > > > fears, false but necessary dogmas, those horribly misplaced
> > ideas and
> > > > > > > > beliefs you have of yourself ... etc. ... continuing, from god
> > knows
> > > > > > > > when, to god knows when ...  leaving you stranded really,
> > wanting,
> > > > > > > > unsure, preoccupied, dark ... ...
>
> > > > > > > > Sorry ... that was my way of suggesting that we all ought to
> > get more
> > > > > > > > real about ourselves, more knowing and clear in our actions,
> > being
> > > > > > > > less and less mental, with less and less subconscious, more
> > happy and
> > > > > > > > content, more self - empowered to infuse strength and cheer
> > among
> > > > > > > > those about us, more battle ready against that wrong thrust
> > upon us,
> > > > > > > > more free of want and dissatisfaction and fear ... well, that
> > does
> > > > > > > > perhaps seem like a trillion mile journey, but no worries, we
> > only
> > > > > > > > need to concern ourselves with just the one that needs to be
> > taken
> > > > > > > > now !
>
> > > > > > > > We are the Work In Progress, or Regress. Yes, I am talking
> > about us.
> > > > > > > > What's more important than that !
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 22, 12:10 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > So how does the idea of parallel uiverse figure in the
> > already
> > > > > > decided
> > > > > > > > chain
> > > > > > > > > of events?
>
> > > > > > > >  > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pat <
> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On 18 June, 13:09, "[email protected]" <
> > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes RP I agree.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > We do it seems have much choice, and we do indeed often
> > have
> > > > > > none.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > An accident, will change the choices that we have and so
> > the
> > > > > > choices
> > > > > > > > > > > that we make.  The future is not defined,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Einstein proved that incorrect 105 years ago.  Proved!
> >  Since then,
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > has never been disproved, rather, only supported.  There is
> > truth,
> > > > > > > > > > though, in your words...the word 'seems'.  It seems that we
> > have
> > > > > > > > > > choices.  That IS true.  But it is an illusion.  And I KNOW
> > we
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > want to go 'round and round' this again.  Do we?  LOL!!
> >  ;-)
>
> > > > > > > > > > >both human choice and
> > > > > > > > > > > circumstances beyond our control for which we have no
> > choices to
> > > > > > > > make,
> > > > > > > > > > > go a loong way in deciding what our futures will be.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On 17 June, 21:07, hassan yacoub <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > no we are not bound by the future but the future is
> > bound by
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > > present and
> > > > > > > > > > > > it is affected by what we do now and whatever we choice
> > and it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > > > > (the
> > > > > > > > > > > > future )a result of the present and this future depends
> > upon
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > effort
> > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > do we try and we may succeed or not we try to do our
> > best and
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > > as we
> > > > > > > > > > > > are strong in mind and in body and educated well by
> > good
> > > > > > knowledge
> > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > succeed and our action be right even right in a place
> > may be
> > > > > > wrong
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > how
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RP <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pat says that we are bound by the future and our
> > choices are
> > > > > > > > > > therefore
> > > > > > > > > > > > > those which result in a particular future event. I
> > beg to
> > > > > > differ
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > believe that our present actions are the result  of
> > our
> > > > > > effort
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > endeavour, but our effort is bound by our physical
> > and
> > > > > > > > psychological
> > > > > > > > > > > > > motives in reaction to the present nature of the
> > environment.
> > > > > > > > That
> > > > > > > > > > > > > what we do becomes definite doesn't change the nature
> > of
> > > > > > actions.
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to