So..it happens over and over again?...but if it happens over and over again.. the big bang throw out i mean..is it the same pattern always.. or is it different each time.. are there infinite possibilities...
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 29 June, 20:50, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry for my ignorance but could any one tell me wat serial universes > > are....... > > > > As I happened to HAVE to come back in to work in order to try to book > a flight, I thought I'd take a peek back here again. What I mean by > 'serial universes' is 'one after another', i.e., universes in a > series, like episodes of os a soap opera. In this case, the case of > universes, each episode starts with a Big Bang and ends with a > cataclysmic/apocalyptic 'Last Day' where the matter of this universe > expands into the anit-matter wall that forms the outer boundary of the > medium through which our space-time expands. Once the huge matter > antimatter collision takes place, this leaves nothing but light > (photons) and, if the boundary of the medium is shaped like a donut > (torus), those photons will wrap around to the centre and re-start the > sequence again with a new Big Bang. > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Pat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On 21 June, 20:10, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So how does the idea of parallel uiverse figure in the already > decided > > > chain > > > > of events? > > > > > They're unnecessary, as a 'proper geometry' can account for serial > > > universes in which all possibilities can be explored. Basically, > > > while parallel universes are 'possible' they aren't as likely as > > > 'serial universes', which can be handled by simple geometry of the > > > overall system. When you have 'all of time' you gain NOTHING by > > > performing events in parallel, so there is no 'gain' in parallel > > > universes. In other words, the concept of parallel universes doesn't > > > pass 'Occam's Razor'. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pat <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 June, 13:09, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes RP I agree. > > > > > > > > We do it seems have much choice, and we do indeed often have > none. > > > > > > > > An accident, will change the choices that we have and so the > choices > > > > > > that we make. The future is not defined, > > > > > > > Einstein proved that incorrect 105 years ago. Proved! Since then, > it > > > > > has never been disproved, rather, only supported. There is truth, > > > > > though, in your words...the word 'seems'. It seems that we have > > > > > choices. That IS true. But it is an illusion. And I KNOW we > don't > > > > > want to go 'round and round' this again. Do we? LOL!! ;-) > > > > > > > >both human choice and > > > > > > circumstances beyond our control for which we have no choices to > > > make, > > > > > > go a loong way in deciding what our futures will be. > > > > > > > > On 17 June, 21:07, hassan yacoub <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > no we are not bound by the future but the future is bound by > our > > > > > present and > > > > > > > it is affected by what we do now and whatever we choice and it > is > > > too > > > > > (the > > > > > > > future )a result of the present and this future depends upon > the > > > effort > > > > > we > > > > > > > do we try and we may succeed or not we try to do our best and > as > > > much > > > > > as we > > > > > > > are strong in mind and in body and educated well by good > knowledge > > > we > > > > > may > > > > > > > succeed and our action be right even right in a place may be > wrong > > > some > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Pat says that we are bound by the future and our choices are > > > > > therefore > > > > > > > > those which result in a particular future event. I beg to > differ > > > and > > > > > > > > believe that our present actions are the result of our > effort > > > and > > > > > > > > endeavour, but our effort is bound by our physical and > > > psychological > > > > > > > > motives in reaction to the present nature of the environment. > > > That > > > > > > > > what we do becomes definite doesn't change the nature of > actions. > > > We > > > > > > > > try to change ourselves and act with a resolve to create a > > > certain > > > > > > > > future , and that future is an effect of our actions and not > > > > > > > > viceversa. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > hi to all- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > -- > > > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- \--/ Peace
