On 29 June, 20:49, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean its just science fiction.. >
More than likely...yes! > > > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 21 June, 20:10, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So how does the idea of parallel uiverse figure in the already decided > > chain > > > of events? > > > They're unnecessary, as a 'proper geometry' can account for serial > > universes in which all possibilities can be explored. Basically, > > while parallel universes are 'possible' they aren't as likely as > > 'serial universes', which can be handled by simple geometry of the > > overall system. When you have 'all of time' you gain NOTHING by > > performing events in parallel, so there is no 'gain' in parallel > > universes. In other words, the concept of parallel universes doesn't > > pass 'Occam's Razor'. > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pat <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On 18 June, 13:09, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yes RP I agree. > > > > > > We do it seems have much choice, and we do indeed often have none. > > > > > > An accident, will change the choices that we have and so the choices > > > > > that we make. The future is not defined, > > > > > Einstein proved that incorrect 105 years ago. Proved! Since then, it > > > > has never been disproved, rather, only supported. There is truth, > > > > though, in your words...the word 'seems'. It seems that we have > > > > choices. That IS true. But it is an illusion. And I KNOW we don't > > > > want to go 'round and round' this again. Do we? LOL!! ;-) > > > > > >both human choice and > > > > > circumstances beyond our control for which we have no choices to > > make, > > > > > go a loong way in deciding what our futures will be. > > > > > > On 17 June, 21:07, hassan yacoub <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > no we are not bound by the future but the future is bound by our > > > > present and > > > > > > it is affected by what we do now and whatever we choice and it is > > too > > > > (the > > > > > > future )a result of the present and this future depends upon the > > effort > > > > we > > > > > > do we try and we may succeed or not we try to do our best and as > > much > > > > as we > > > > > > are strong in mind and in body and educated well by good knowledge > > we > > > > may > > > > > > succeed and our action be right even right in a place may be wrong > > some > > > > how > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Pat says that we are bound by the future and our choices are > > > > therefore > > > > > > > those which result in a particular future event. I beg to differ > > and > > > > > > > believe that our present actions are the result of our effort > > and > > > > > > > endeavour, but our effort is bound by our physical and > > psychological > > > > > > > motives in reaction to the present nature of the environment. > > That > > > > > > > what we do becomes definite doesn't change the nature of actions. > > We > > > > > > > try to change ourselves and act with a resolve to create a > > certain > > > > > > > future , and that future is an effect of our actions and not > > > > > > > viceversa. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > hi to all- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
