On 29 June, 20:50, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> sorry for my ignorance but could any one tell me wat serial universes
> are.......
>

As I happened to HAVE to come back in to work in order to try to book
a flight, I thought I'd take a peek back here again.  What I mean by
'serial universes' is 'one after another', i.e., universes in a
series, like episodes of os a soap opera.  In this case, the case of
universes, each episode starts with a Big Bang and ends with a
cataclysmic/apocalyptic 'Last Day' where the matter of this universe
expands into the anit-matter wall that forms the outer boundary of the
medium through which our space-time expands.  Once the huge matter
antimatter collision takes place, this leaves nothing but light
(photons) and, if the boundary of the medium is shaped like a donut
(torus), those photons will wrap around to the centre and re-start the
sequence again with a new Big Bang.

>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 21 June, 20:10, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > So how does the idea of parallel uiverse figure in the already decided
> > chain
> > > of events?
>
> > They're unnecessary, as a 'proper geometry' can account for serial
> > universes in which all possibilities can be explored.  Basically,
> > while parallel universes are 'possible' they aren't as likely as
> > 'serial universes', which can be handled by simple geometry of the
> > overall system.  When you have 'all of time' you gain NOTHING by
> > performing events in parallel, so there is no 'gain' in parallel
> > universes.  In other words, the concept of parallel universes doesn't
> > pass 'Occam's Razor'.
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pat <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > On 18 June, 13:09, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Yes RP I agree.
>
> > > > > We do it seems have much choice, and we do indeed often have none.
>
> > > > > An accident, will change the choices that we have and so the choices
> > > > > that we make.  The future is not defined,
>
> > > > Einstein proved that incorrect 105 years ago.  Proved!  Since then, it
> > > > has never been disproved, rather, only supported.  There is truth,
> > > > though, in your words...the word 'seems'.  It seems that we have
> > > > choices.  That IS true.  But it is an illusion.  And I KNOW we don't
> > > > want to go 'round and round' this again.  Do we?  LOL!!  ;-)
>
> > > > >both human choice and
> > > > > circumstances beyond our control for which we have no choices to
> > make,
> > > > > go a loong way in deciding what our futures will be.
>
> > > > > On 17 June, 21:07, hassan yacoub <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > no we are not bound by the future but the future is bound by our
> > > > present and
> > > > > > it is affected by what we do now and whatever we choice and it is
> > too
> > > > (the
> > > > > > future )a result of the present and this future depends upon the
> > effort
> > > > we
> > > > > > do we try and we may succeed or not we try to do our best and as
> > much
> > > > as we
> > > > > > are strong in mind and in body and educated well by good knowledge
> > we
> > > > may
> > > > > > succeed and our action be right even right in a place may be wrong
> > some
> > > > how
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Pat says that we are bound by the future and our choices are
> > > > therefore
> > > > > > > those which result in a particular future event. I beg to differ
> > and
> > > > > > > believe that our present actions are the result  of our effort
> > and
> > > > > > > endeavour, but our effort is bound by our physical and
> > psychological
> > > > > > > motives in reaction to the present nature of the environment.
> > That
> > > > > > > what we do becomes definite doesn't change the nature of actions.
> > We
> > > > > > > try to change ourselves and act with a resolve to create a
> > certain
> > > > > > > future , and that future is an effect of our actions and not
> > > > > > > viceversa.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > hi to all- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to