Dude...there is no need to vent out your sexual frustation this way!...if
you have such a big problem then post somewhere else! but wait..people dont
believe you are the smartest person in the world ,now ..do they. its a
sucker!

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem with links
> > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to direct folks to
> > your personal website. This is what is generally considered shameless
> > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise like links
> > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion.
> >
> Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self promotion etc.
> clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist education
> system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group seems to be a
> group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no common-sense
> at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will quote a
> comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators "vamadevanada" (May 18,
> 2010) :
>     I know. And I have access to libraries. It means nothing, in the
>     course of a discussion.
>
>     Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of a
> conversation.
>     You only put across yourself, what you know and have to say, in
> terms
>     and using words I can understand. And I suppose I speak for
> everyone
>     here.
>
> Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to your
> mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency which is
> preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start with alphabet
> "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like you do not
> deserve anything else than that.
>
> Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned comment of
> moderator. But that also may not be in line with the meaningless
> guideline of Minds-Eye group.
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:>
> At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 dimensional
> > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by Kaplan. "A loose
> > > > bipolar system is a construct in international relations posited by
> > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and Process in
> > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant to reflect the
> > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical arrangement."
> >
> > >         The bipolar system forms the basis of civilization.
> > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the good & the bad.
> > > It can be applied to global political system as well. Then why do such
> > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system appear to be
> > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed such political
> > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to be. It is the
> > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model cannot not be
> > > blamed for that.
> >
> > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D universe giving
> the
> > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good vantage point?!
> >
> > >      In the absence of true infinity, multiverse system will never
> > > become multipolar system.
> >
> > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | eHow.comhttp://
> www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4...
> >
> > >      Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. (You have shown
> > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines regarding links.)
> >
> > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]>
> wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would agree that you are
> > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your post implies
> duality
> > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality is but an
> illusion.
> > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum physics as well
> as
> > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of PROVING anything
> > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in Minds-Eye space as
> far
> > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is competitive and
> will
> > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose is not an issue.
> The
> > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and persevering.
> >
> > > > >      I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my post. My
> objection
> > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of infinite layers,
> > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from bipolar system. So,
> now
> > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite number of layers on
> > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of Minds-Eye...
> >
> > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >       Any multiverse system will eventually boil down to a
> bipolar
> > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or you are part of
> organised
> > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option.
> > > > > > >       Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. So, Minds-Eye space
> cannot
> > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves to be infinite,
> in this
> > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will always get
> challenged...
> >
> > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye  -  2 posts  -  2 authors  - Last
> post:  Mar
> > > > > > > > 12, 2008
> > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each
> layer
> > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end
> as the
> > > > > > > > past is ...
> http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8...
> >
> > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing
> a lot
> > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my
> belief I
> > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -




-- 
\--/ Peace

Reply via email to