Just as an aside, here's a little quote from our old frozen friend Walt Disney; "Walt Disney All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them. ... If you can dream it, you can do it." Ok, enough with the Mickey Mouse shit!
On Jul 23, 11:53 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > YES! I love it! > > On Jul 23, 11:32 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If the One was really the One, the way you say it is, then you are one > > and I am one and yet we are parallel universes. Learning to not make > > the mistakes of the other only via the means of communication has been > > an enormous gain in the history of elegant creation. And just as there > > is no Nobel Prize for fairy tales there is none for > > mathematics:http://nobelprizes.com/nobel/why_no_math.html > > > On 23 Jul., 14:20, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 4 July, 17:59, ashok tewari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Whose need are talking about ? Pat's ? God's ? That's why I suggest > > > > : let > > > > speculation be just that ; do not take it to be the truth. As OM would > > > > say > > > > : Don't believe all that you think ! > > > > If you put that "Don't believe all that you think" into action > > > yourself, then you must refute that very notion. Where does THAT land > > > you? If you don't believe what you think, why should anyone else > > > believe what you think? > > > > The 'need' was, of course, that of 'The One', who HAS all of time, > > > and, therefore, gains nothing by virtue of running universes in > > > parallel. The only thing we gain by doing things 'in parallel' is > > > time and, when you have all of time (as 'The One' does), nothing is > > > gained. Therefore, I stick by my thought and say that parallel > > > universes, while possible, aren't likely as nothing is gained by their > > > employment. > > > > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Pat really is the resident expert here so for a full understanding you > > > > > might consider waiting for his return. I believe his thought is that > > > > > there is no need for parallel universes, when serial universes (one > > > > > change is enough, no need to re create the entire universe for it) are > > > > > more efficient. The whole Occam Razors bit. I am sure he would give > > > > > you an honest run for your money if he was available to do so. > > > > > > On Jul 3, 8:15 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > > > > > > 12, 2008 > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > > > > > > past is ... > > > > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my > > > > > > belief I > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence? > > > > > -- > > > > ASHOK TEWARI- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
