A number of responses on this thread use alternative definitions of the 
concept of ego. 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Molly <[email protected]>
To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Aug 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Understanding: Mind, Consciousness, Thought


I believe the Banks model defines ego as a system of thought.  I see

no contradiction with that and what you are saying here.



On Aug 28, 11:55 am, [email protected] wrote:

>  One of the serious confusions in this thread is the alternative definitions 

of the concept of ego. The common understanding of ego is

>

> equated with conceit - as in egotistical. Used in psychoanalysis the concept 

of ego (along with the superego, the id and the self ) are components of the 

structure of the self. From this perspective the concept of ego functions like 
a 

traffic cop mediating between the desires of the id (I want what I want when I 

want it ) and the super ego (the voice of laws: shoulds and should nots).

>

> In short the ego psychoanalytically is the voice of reason - thoughtfulness.

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: gruff <[email protected]>

> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>

> Sent: Sat, Aug 28, 2010 10:09 am

> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Understanding: Mind, Consciousness, Thought

>

> Allow me to introduce Occam's Razor, which was first articulated by

>

> William of Occam in the thirteenth century.  It postulates that all

>

> else being equal, simpler explanations should be preferred over more

>

> complex ones.

>

> What is being explored here sounds more like religion than science.

>

> Can we slice it down to it's simplest form?

>

> Ego!  I suspect all animals have it to one degree or another but with

>

> regard human beings, we could not live without one.  Scaling ego, I'd

>

> have to say that the more insecure the individual the greater the

>

> ego.  I suspect there is a level or range of ego which allows us to

>

> exist but when our consciousness goes below that level, we shrivel,

>

> and when it goes above that level we swell up like an over-inflated

>

> balloon and burst.


 

Reply via email to