Heh heh.  Cute.

Now here's two photos of the snake.  It's actually pretty deadly.

http://www.reptilesdownunder.com/arod/reptilia/Squamata/Elapidae/Denisonia/maculata

http://www.arkive.org/ornamental-snake/denisonia-maculata/image-G43903.html

On Aug 30, 3:50 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 8:24 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >   You are somewhat of a riddle Slip. I like it! <
>
> Well thanks, Ash, actually the Riddler in the movie Bat Man is based
> on one of my fictitious past lives.
>
> Now for my next riddle:  What is ornamental but has a very small mind?
>
> For the answer click the link below.
>
> http://www.australianfauna.com/ornamentalsnake.php
>
> That's right, this poisonous slithering creature despite it's
> decorative appearance doesn't do much except eat and just attack
> frogs; now there is an ego for ya.  Sounds like a very picky eater.
>
> Well gotta go before Bat Man and Robin find out I'm here.
>
> Adios Amigo!
>
> On Aug 28, 8:24 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >   You are somewhat of a riddle Slip. I like it!
>
> > On 8/28/2010 7:58 PM, Slip Disc wrote:
>
> > > I think existence itself is ego, that is, ego that is manifest in
> > > physical form.  Gwill is right by addressing the various uses of term
> > > ego in this thread, such as inflated or deflated ego, ego trip, ego
> > > maniac etc.  I see the ego being the core of life itself, the core of
> > > who we are, the internal that is expressed outward.  Animals also are
> > > ego displayed by domination, alpha, acquiescence and deferment to the
> > > top dog etc.  Ego at the moment of conception defines who and what we
> > > are but after one has developed within the environmental world ego
> > > branches off into splinter groups of ego, alter ego and such and at
> > > which time the term ego takes on all mundane aspects.  Ego lives
> > > beyond our physicality, beyond anything we can imagine.  Ego is a part
> > > of cosmology.  All physical beings are on a "ego trip", literally.
>
> > > On Aug 28, 3:23 pm, rigsy03<[email protected]>  wrote:
> > >> It might be confused with pride or self-preservation. I agree with
> > >> your definition.
>
> > >> Here is another angle: "Does Your Language Shape How You Think?" by
> > >> Guy Deutscher  
> > >> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29language-t.html
> > >> I was thinking, while reading this article, that there are even more
> > >> culprits than language such as gender, class, religion and so on.
>
> > >> On Aug 28, 10:55 am, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > >>>   One of the serious confusions in this thread is the alternative 
> > >>> definitions of the concept of ego. The common understanding of ego is
> > >>> equated with conceit - as in egotistical. Used in psychoanalysis the 
> > >>> concept of ego (along with the superego, the id and the self ) are 
> > >>> components of the structure of the self. From this perspective the 
> > >>> concept of ego functions like a traffic cop mediating between the 
> > >>> desires of the id (I want what I want when I want it ) and the super 
> > >>> ego (the voice of laws: shoulds and should nots).
> > >>> In short the ego psychoanalytically is the voice of reason - 
> > >>> thoughtfulness.
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: gruff<[email protected]>
> > >>> To: "Minds Eye"<[email protected]>
> > >>> Sent: Sat, Aug 28, 2010 10:09 am
> > >>> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Understanding: Mind, Consciousness, Thought
> > >>> Allow me to introduce Occam's Razor, which was first articulated by
> > >>> William of Occam in the thirteenth century.  It postulates that all
> > >>> else being equal, simpler explanations should be preferred over more
> > >>> complex ones.
> > >>> What is being explored here sounds more like religion than science.
> > >>> Can we slice it down to it's simplest form?
> > >>> Ego!  I suspect all animals have it to one degree or another but with
> > >>> regard human beings, we could not live without one.  Scaling ego, I'd
> > >>> have to say that the more insecure the individual the greater the
> > >>> ego.  I suspect there is a level or range of ego which allows us to
> > >>> exist but when our consciousness goes below that level, we shrivel,
> > >>> and when it goes above that level we swell up like an over-inflated
> > >>> balloon and burst.- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to