I can easily understand the animosity being felt toward debt -- any
kind of debt -- at the moment.  It wasn't that long ago that even
being in debt was considered sinful and immoral and interest rates
above a single digit minimum were usury and illegal.  There was a
shame attached to being in debt and worse should someone file
bankruptcy.

But these are different times and different systems and those feelings
are not necessarily valid.  To understand our economic system requires
a little history.  We set up the Federal Reserve System in the early
20th century in reaction to the crash of '28 and in anticipation of
putting aside the gold standard of currency and letting its value
float freely, it was designed to be an independent regulatory system
that would be a control over the economy by setting the prime rate and
printing money.

Other developed nations did the same thing.  Then in 1971 we and the
rest of the world left the gold standard and everyone's currency and
investments were valued at the market.  Well, being the biggest,
baddest and wealthiest, the U.S. became the standard for the world.
Everyone's currency was valued in dollars and we enjoyed that
status.

This set the free market economy loose in a way that gold never
could.  There was only so much gold and finding more and processing it
was becoming harder and more expensive.  It was an anchor on a global
economy that was chomping at the bit, wanting to be set loose.  And it
did fine.  The wealth of the U.S. and the world, measured in it's
productivity or Gross Domestic Product grew rapidly.

In 1973, just two years after we left the gold standard, the global
GDP was more than $16 trillion and just last year had more than
quadrupled to $75 trillion.  That's more than 400% return in just two
years.

Of the trillion dollar economies in the world, the U.S. still ranks
first at $14 tn, followed closely by China with $8 tn. Next comes
Japan ($4 tn), India ($3.4 tn), Germany ($2.7 tn) the United Kingdom
($2.1 tn), Russia ($2.1 tn) and France ($2 tn) followed by the rest of
the nearly two hundred nations which figure prominently in the global
economy.

But as it is with our species, we tend to go to extremes and have a
larcenous nature.  That our new found wealth was based on a fiat
currency, as some sneeringly call it, and it's true to a degree, but
that fictional currency the Fed seems to print so freely, still buys
hard goods and services.

Banks became so wealthy they started to loan money to anyone at
anytime for anything and threw in credit cards just to make it
easier.  And we all followed that unentitled exuberance right into two
wars and the biggest debt we've ever had (dollarwise, that is.
Compared to the GDP we were in deeper after WWII).  We now found we'd
mortgaged all our assets many times their real value and overall, we
-- government, business and individuals alike -- were in debt an
average of three times our annual incomes.

Like all card houses they must eventually fall and Bang! -- in late
2007 fall it did.  Or the bubble popped.  However you prefer to look
at it, it's still the same event.  All that over-extended debt came
due and the bill couldn't be paid.  The first thing to fall were
property values since that was where most value and debt lay.  Since
'07 property values have fallen 25% to 40% depending on location.
Then the investments based on those mortgages began to fall because
they'd been leveraged into thin air.   But this is not a real fall or
loss of value in that the perceived and actual value didn't exist.  It
had been leveraged into thin air.  People were losing what they never
really had.

By mid 2008 the banks and investment houses which had trillions
invested and at risk in these highly leveraged and worthless
investments were coming apart.  Lehman Brothers, a 130 year old and
respected investment house went bankrupt overnight.  This was when it
became clear that the banks were next to fall since a lot of their
balance sheet assets were tied up in these risky and now worthless
investments.

This scared the hell out of a lot of the people at the top because if
the banks failed, then we'd really be back in the dark ages.  There'd
be no economy, no trade, no business, no goods or services, nothing.
So to save economy it became necessary to save the banks immediately
just to keep the world economy moving.  We could not let it stall.  An
economy needs momentum to stay alive.  Fortunately most of the movers
and shakers of the world recognized this crisis and responded
appropriately -- borrowing money to shore up the banks.

Unfortunately fear of collapse scared most of the middle and lower
classes in the wrong direction.  They railed against saving the banks
and begged the government to give the money to Main St., as it was
euphamized, rather than Wall St.  They were not sufficiently educated
to see what had to come first and were reacting emotionally.  So the
first TARP funds -- remember? Troubled Asset Relief Program  -- helped
the banks stay out of bankruptcy.  Unfortunately the lower case fears
kept the recovery and next stimulus too small to do the job properly,
so we've still got falling values and high unemployment.

Without spending we've taken the slow road to recovery which may last
ten years while increasing the spending -- and yes, that means
increasing the debt as well -- would have brought us out of this hole
in maybe two or three years and back to full employment (4%).

But the question is about debt.  Many people see the growing national
debt -- the amount of money we are borrowing via bond purchases and
printing money -- as an albatross around the necks of the next two or
three generations.  This is a common perspective if debt is not seen
in its proper perspective.  Remember, we cut loose from gold in 1971,
so there isn't a $10 trillion lump of the metal hanging around our
necks dragging us down.

Our currency and it's value is based roughly on how much we produce in
goods and services each year.  Since we still have 91.5% of our
workforce actively producing and earning and most all the rest of us
still consuming, our annual GDP has not dropped below $14 trillion
during the recession.

So we're standing here now with at worst a $10 trillion debt and
earning $14 trillion a year.  That debt doesn't look so bad now, does
it?  Debt is generally meaningless in and of itself.  It only takes on
meaning when compared to and balanced with other economic factors.

Other economic factors that can reduce the value of a debt are the
growth of the economy which reduces the value of the debt
proportionally; an increase in debt owed to us also reduces our own
debt directly; debt can be rolled over numerous times and over time
the principle can actually disappear with growth of the economy; debt
can and is quite frequently forgiven for political purposes; and the
value of a currency can appreciate so much that it takes but a small
amount to retire debt.

So in a fiat economy such as we have, it can truthfully be said that
the economy is a fiction -- i.e., the value we give our currency is
arbitrary and fluctuates constantly.  So if our currency is a fiction,
doesn't it follow that our debt is a fiction as well?

All of this is then good reason to spend our way out of the recession
and let the debt be serviced over time in the best way possible while
we crank up the economy and go along our merry way creating more
goods, services and wealth for most all of us.

A free market capitalist system of economics works.  What ruins it
each time is human failure -- incompetence, ignorance, greed, envy and
lust.

One more thing I'd like to say about our economy.  We can bitch and
moan and groan about the top 2% and how they control us and want to
rule the world, but the fact is that while the do rule the world --
when you have most of the money in the world you can pretty much do as
you please -- they are helpless without the rest of us.  Any economy
works from the top down and those at the base are the ultimate
consumers -- the ones who work to earn then spend.  Without a consumer
base there is nothing to be at the top of.   The elite actually need
us more than we need them.  Consumer power is just beginning to come
to the fore.

With all due regard for having to plow through my words,

/e

Reply via email to