Oh, yes, i just read Dostoevsky's crime and punishment We should exclude murder for revenge and justice too, this is a personal reason, and not a valid one to kill.
A better world, this is a valid reason. We only have to know wich are the limits of a better world, and the ways to make it On 22 Gen, 14:37, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > crime and punishment? > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, wizard_47_cpp <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Recently i was thinking about murder. I was wondering if this, > > sometimes, could be the best solution to many important problems (i > > obvious exclude personal and economical ones). There are some people > > who we think should die, because they damage the society, the world > > and other people. So, do we have the right to kill this individuals? > > I'm some kind of atheist (exaclty i don't believe in an antropomorphic > > god, endowed with an human-like will), so i don't think, like > > somebody, only god has the right to kill humans. > > My thought is we have this right, but it needs valid motivations. > > But now the questions are: does valid motivations really exist? can > > human understand wich are them? > > The topic can become wider with the last one, it implicates the > > understanding of an absolute truth. > > > Sorry for my english > > -- > \--/ Peace
