“…revolution in knowledge and philosophy…” – PSK ??? To continue the discussion, one would need to know what you mean here. Would you unpack it a bit?
Before actually knowing what you mean, I see little if any ‘revolution’ in this context. Yes, there is a process of change in thought over the millennia yet such general ‘change’ doesn’t mean a progression towards a more accurate view. Case in point – you are apparently using the dialectical view of one view being in contradiction with another. While many do apprehend in this way, in no way is that an indicator of the accuracy of such a view. As best as I can see, both can be known consubstantially. On Mar 7, 2:25 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was thinking .... i agree with what yuo guys say ....could it also be the > revolution in knowledge and philosophy...when it was questioned....what > can an INdividual know.....it kind of pitts one against the whole in this > struggle to know...or salvation through knowledge...what say.... > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]>wrote: > > > True we have come a long way..and the word has been taken for > > granted....but i would like an opinion of each one of you ...on the > > Sanctity of Freedom.... it is also my casual inference > > that....individuality ...the modern obsession with it....how come > > some primitive tribes...hold the community at a level above the > > individual....while it is not quite so in our 'modernised'...or rather > > westernised world.....are there concepts of radicalised individuality > > in the oriental philosophy..... need your opoinions fellows > > -- > \--/ Peace
